![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 23, 2:37*pm, "Matt Herron Jr." wrote:
snip... If we 'got lucky' with something like the Disney TV shows of the 1960's and .01% of the 300 million US population sought flight instruction in gliders, 30,000 people would descend on our training operations. *I expect 29,000 of them would be very unhappy with us. Before we start "pushing" a mass market response into our 'pipeline', we'd better clean the pipes. The quickest, easiest and cheapest way to get 1300 new student starts per year is for each of the roughly 15,000 US glider pilots to just talk to a few people about soaring. Bill Daniels Chairman, SSA Growth and Development Committee I agree with most of what you are saying Bill, but I don't understand why we need to increase our training capacity beyond 2000 pilots/ year. *That would be an increase in total soaring pilots of *over 13% per year! (less attrition, of course) *I would call that an astounding success. *As rusty as the pipeline may be, I would contend that lack of capacity is not our biggest problem. Matt Matt, I agree 1300 - 2000 new pilots a year would be a huge success. A few years from now, I'd like to see that expanded well beyond 2000 a year. But, those numbers put some scale to the "promotion of soaring" discussion. It also says that if we want that growth rate, we have to start thinking about how to deal with it. If our target is 2000 per year, and I believe that's reasonable, then mass media isn't the right first line approach. Although, I'll take all the successes like Tom Knauff's Good Morning America segment we can get. I think "viral marketing" and social media represent a better approach. I hope we can get more grass roots effort. Just tell people about what we do and send them to web sites with great images and videos. If they have the "soaring gene" they will become glider pilots no matter what else happens. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd also contend that, in addition to the above good thinking for new
recruits, we emphasize reducing attrition for those who've gone through training. With greater exposure to cross country soaring, whether through dual flights, ground school, videos, etc. we can plant the seed of what really is the allure. Kemp |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like the idea of grass roots, and that is certainly where the
enthusiasm lies. But I don't think we have viral marketing potential here. Viral marketing means I tell ten people and each one of those people tells ten people, and those hundred tell ten each, etc. so the numbers grow on their own exponentially. A good example would be a funny email, easily forwarded to friends. The sport of soaring is appealing when first seen, but complex, and I am not sure someone exposed to flying gliders for the first time would muster the "infectious" enthusiasm needed to evangelize the sport to ten of their friends. It is probably closer to a more traditional direct marketing model. That being said, lets say 25% of all US glider pilots really reached out and personally talked to whopping 50 people each, every year. That's 187,500 new folks exposed to soaring. And lets say a person who learns of soaring from a real pilot is ten times more likely to explore it than someone who sees it on TV. At 1%, that's 1,875 folks that actually try it-- about the numbers we were looking for. Now contrast that to good morning America whose viewership in 2008 was 4.4 million people. at 1/10th the hit rate of our evangelical pilots, 0.1% of viewers would actually try it, and that's 4,400 people! All created with the effort of just a few enthusiastic pilots . Of course these are all just fabricated numbers until we have some measurable metrics that tell us what folks really do, but I really think soaring is invisible to most folks. We need some serious "brand awareness" to go along with our grass roots efforts. I think John S. hit the nail on the head. Matt |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 23, 11:45*am, John Cochrane
wrote: Pull is good, but conversion is harder. The sad fact is that we fail miserably at converting first rides into long-time pilots. For each ride, how many get a license? For each license, how many are still flying 3 years later? Typical numbers I've heard are about one in a thousand. If that were even one in a hundred, we'd have 10 times more glider pilots! John Cochrane Rough statistics from one club- Valley Soaring Club- Middletown NY Close estimates for '09 About 1600 tows/Yr About 160 introductory flights(360 the year the NY Times article came out). About 40 four flight intro packages which lets prospect see what it's really about- then they join or find out it's not for them. About 15 new members About 10 new solo pilots About 8 new certificated pilots FWIW UH |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think all of the above posters have the right idea...the concept is
to "grow" the sport, but nobody has any grasp of what the numbers are of active glider pilots, instructor pilots, new rides, FAST offers, Calls to local glider ports, rate of activity. I do believe that statistics, numbers need to be compiled. We can't figure out if we need pull marketing, viral marketing, publicity campaigns, and any other types of publicity until we know what we are pushing for! One Example of what we need to know: Do we want to approach pilots with power tickets? Do we have better success with youth? or better success at converting the power pilot, or do we have a better success rate with the person that calls for a "joy ride". Omri has a a great idea that an individual giving the ride should have the passion and personality to address the needs of the person enquiring and taking a test ride. the bottom line for me, is that we need to compile some data. Regular surveys of the clubs, or reporting of how many calls/rides/instruction requests/new members. Can't market what you don't know. just my 2cents Micki |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 24, 10:33*am, MickiMinner wrote:
I think all of the above posters have the right idea...the concept is to "grow" the sport, but nobody has any grasp of what the numbers are of active glider pilots, instructor pilots, new rides, FAST offers, Calls to local glider ports, rate of activity. I do believe that statistics, numbers need to be compiled. We can't figure out if we need pull marketing, viral marketing, publicity campaigns, and any other types of publicity until we know what we are pushing for! One Example of what we need to know: Do we want to approach pilots with power tickets? *Do we have better success with youth? or better success at converting the power pilot, or do we have a better success rate with the person that calls for a "joy ride". Omri has a a great idea that an individual giving the ride should have the passion and personality to address the needs of the person enquiring and taking a test ride. the bottom line for me, is that we need to compile some data. *Regular surveys of the clubs, or reporting of how many calls/rides/instruction requests/new members. *Can't market what you don't know. just my 2cents Micki Pulling hen's teeth while herding cats;^) Actually, part of the digital revolution is that we are at the cusp of such data retrieval. Most operations are likely using some sort of accounting software from which reports may be derived. How, I've also heard from COBM that commercial operators will be unlikely to share such data. Among chapters, many are non-profit entities and must provide information upon request (though may charge reasonable re- production costs). However, past performance is not prediction of the future. Both commercial operations and clubs can change in appeal and performance, usually to a knee-jerk reaction to some event or a change in internal politics, so I'm not sure a study will help market, though it may help define what works. Part of the problem has been the difficulty to keeping current contact information for chapter leadership. The clubs & chapters committee compiled that information and surveyed for about 110 chapters under Dave Newill. However, club and chapter leadership changes every year or two. The committee also used the WTF contact info to try and have chapters complete some online information updates. We eventually got about forty inputs out of 140 clubs and chapters, yet it remained time intensive. This year the SSA office included a request for chapter leadership functions in the chapter renewal process. Response has been very good, thank you very much. Doug Easton has recently provided the committee with a leadership view which will help us communicate better with chapters. Statistics and data collection is part of that digital media experience that I've included within my draft proposal for formation of an SSA Digital Media Working Group. This group will hopefully examine, propose, and implement actions to leverage audio, video, imagery, web techniques, social networking, webinars, mentoring, and story boarding to place some strategic on-target, on-message links to our sport and organizations. Internal data collection and introspection is part of the mix. Annually I submit an input to the world gliding report, but it's very limited due to the lack of resources available. As John Seaborn mentions, this will take some aggressive and committed volunteers. I agree. We have significant individual talent and effort out there. If we could get those individual to put ten or twenty percent of that effort into a focused package of strategies with a national, regional, and local emphasis, we'd move forward rapidly. Without that framework, I think hiring national marketing expertise would not give us the results hoped for. We need the resources first. Yesterday, while sorting through some Soaring magazines with a soaring friend, he mentioned that the SSA staffed a marketing expert in the late 1970's. Before my time as an SSA member (1980), so perhaps someone else can give us a history lesson on Sunny Vesgo, "The Sunny Side" column, and the eventual outcomes. I'm told there was much dis-satisfaction at the end of the day. As far as what may work, see my committee post on the SSA web site today on Leveraging the SSA FAST and SSA Introductory Membership for chapter growth. Frank Whiteley |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So how to we turn these good ideas into tangible action at a national
level? What is the mechanism by which new initiatives are taken up by the SSA? Who ya gonna call? As a start, I will pledge $100 to any fund earmarked for gathering some of these statistics and creating an action plan. I want to save my sport from extinction. Anyone else? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 24, 10:33*am, MickiMinner wrote:
I think all of the above posters have the right idea...the concept is to "grow" the sport, but nobody has any grasp of what the numbers are of active glider pilots, instructor pilots, new rides, FAST offers, Calls to local glider ports, rate of activity. I do believe that statistics, numbers need to be compiled. We can't figure out if we need pull marketing, viral marketing, publicity campaigns, and any other types of publicity until we know what we are pushing for! One Example of what we need to know: Do we want to approach pilots with power tickets? *Do we have better success with youth? or better success at converting the power pilot, or do we have a better success rate with the person that calls for a "joy ride". Omri has a a great idea that an individual giving the ride should have the passion and personality to address the needs of the person enquiring and taking a test ride. the bottom line for me, is that we need to compile some data. *Regular surveys of the clubs, or reporting of how many calls/rides/instruction requests/new members. *Can't market what you don't know. just my 2cents Micki Miki, I absolutely agree accurate, current statistics are needed. The first thing I did was to conduct a survey by calling and e-mailing all the organizations listed with the SSA. That's where the numbers in my earlier post came from. The responses weren't universal but there was enough to extrapolate the rest with pretty good accuracy. It would really help if soaring organizations kept their data on the "Where to Fly" list up to date. What jumped out was our aggregate annual training capacity doesn't exceed 2000/year and may be as low as 1000. At any given time only about 300 - 400 new students can be accepted - that's with business as usual. Commercial operations generally fly any day the weather is flyable with northern operations putting in about 180 days a year and southern operators about 300 days a year with limited opportunity increase that number. Clubs tend to only operate on fair weather weekends which averages out to less than 60 days a year. The big opportunity to expand the training capacity without adding equipment is for clubs to stage training camps that run 14 days straight. Some clubs do several of these camps a year. I could only find 179 tow planes but I'll allow that I might have missed a few which is why I said 200 tugs. Winches can increase our "uphill capacity" significantly and are well suited for training. We actually have plenty of instructors but a lot of them aren't really active instructors. The SSA might bring some back to active status by organizing a group instructor liability policy. I think it would also help if more attractive training gliders were available. (Some of us old guys are too creaky to fold ourselves into the back seat of a 2-33 or L-13.) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank-
Sometimes I think that many SSA members don't know the tools developed and thus already have in hand! "Sales" is a hurtle race requiring a sequence of activities to flow adequately well...Awareness (GMA, Disney, all activities NOT at the airport), trial Interest (FAST, positve experience via a rides, convienence, fun website, airshow booths), Qualifiying (safety/ finances/rank against alternatives), Closing ("the ask" to join, friendly faces, SSA Intro program), and maintaining involvement (SSA badges, club activities, secondary benefits, clean WC facilities). Stumble on one of these hurtles or misdiagnois the problem and the whole process is certainly less efficent. Every organization is different and thus has different areas to focus on, often fixing one problem in the waterfall creates a pooling in the next level (aka "The problem I want to have"). That is why we have so many solutions because at the field level we who run soaring organizations actually have many different marketing problems. That's why the solutions can seem so complicated...it is a complex problem. Frank W, Dave N, Val P have created many great tools to grow soaring. The improved SSA Growbook is online...when was the last time you looked at that? It's all there. It's hard to be "viral" without a compelling club website, being "social" takes a team of individuals working in concert..OK make it happen, the whole SSA website is a media section. Quit wishing and start moving. You have everyones permission you need. Ask yourself if you could change just one or two things to grow soaring at your local soaring site, what would they be? We don't lack solutions, IMHO many lack initiative. Now ducking behind the soapbox to avoid the tomatoes.... LT PS- A big congrats to Tucson Soaring for doing something "the first time"! THAT IS THE BEST THING I HAVE READ IN THIS THREAD. We need everyone to do something more, different, or "the first time". The answers are all around us, each local organization just needs to (re) assemble them. This should be the primary subject for discussion around the grog bowl at every end of year soaring gathering. Have an "improved club marketing membership plan" for 2010. NOTE: OCSA used to have a growing soaring club...now OCSA's problem is completely different. I'm learning again, see: http://groups.google.com/group/save-...et-today?hl=en As far as what may work, see my committee post on the SSA web site today on Leveraging the SSA FAST and SSA Introductory Membership for chapter growth. Frank Whiteley- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was one of the volunteers at the recent Tucson Soaring Club Open
House and the response from the public was just amazing. We gave over 120 guest rides in two days over the weekend (even managed a couple on the Friday for folks who showed up early). I have never seen so many continuous launches - two towplanes on the go intertwined with Roman's winch. We also did another first - a dual aerotow (two gliders, one towplane) for a demonstration aerobatics program. Many people said the same thing - we didn't know that your club was here or gliding was such a cool sport. Since then, we have added five new members, two or three more than we would typically expect. We currently have around 120 members and are shooting for 150, a goal we expect to meet within the year. Even better than adding new members, the Open House brought our existing membership together and we had just a fantastic club weekend. Pilots are invited to come and experience our wonderful club for themselves - guest members are always welcome - or just sign up for Region 9 South, which we are hosting next May. We also aim to become the number one US cross-country site next year (at least on OLC score) Mike |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Join my new group just for small business owners to promote theirservices | busybeemike | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 15th 08 03:59 AM |
HELP PROMOTE SOARING Glider Ride or Lesson for Christmas | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | December 18th 07 06:55 AM |
How to promote this thing we do (long post) | Jeff[_1_] | Piloting | 23 | August 3rd 07 03:49 AM |
trying to promote | old man | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | January 27th 04 07:56 PM |
Osceola, Wisconsin Glider Operation? | Scott | Soaring | 6 | January 19th 04 07:46 PM |