A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hercules Engines



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #32  
Old January 17th 04, 08:39 AM
Steve R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
y.com...

Lockheed has used some version/model of the Allison T-56 since "1956" on

all
C-130 models. Yes it is called a Allison T-56 because it was a "56 model
Allison Turbine Engine". The same year the C-130 first flew at/from
Marietta, Ga.

There have been numerous improvements made to this basic engine design

over
the years to incorporate new technology, increase power, etc., but the

basic
design remains the same.

The "T 56-15 Model Allison Engine" referred to by Phil, means a Allison

T-56
engine incorporating the 15 th update.

Check the model # of the Allison T-56 engine used on the C-130J. If you do

a
little checking, you will find the T-56-15 engine was used on late C130 E

&
G models.

Tarver you claim to be an "Electrical Engineer". Don't you know better

than
to argue with a person quoting the manual on a given/specified item?
Apparently not.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type



Actually, the J has the AE2100D3 engine. The T56 production line was shut
down shortly after the J went into production.
Steve R.



  #33  
Old January 17th 04, 03:02 PM
John Mazor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"JL Grasso" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:55:11 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


Otherwise, you are likely to become a hazard to aviation.


You're the Wierd Al Yankovic of technology.


The Svengali of Splaps


  #34  
Old January 17th 04, 03:38 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Rick" wrote in message
k.net...
George Ruch wrote:


Yeah, OK, so in Tarverworld the temperature of the gas
entering the turbine is around 18,000 degrees C.



Roughly the surface temperature of a Class B star. Considering titanium
boils at 3,278C, could this be ... magic metallurgy? g, d & r


It does seem a bit warm for a turbine but Tarver says the
thermocouples are wired in series so that they add up to the
"total inlet temperature." And Tarver couldn't be wrong
could he?


Here we see how Rick has the reading and comprehension skills of an
elementary school student. Why would you think that adding the signals from
thermocouples in series would add the temperature?

How do you survive in this world, Rick?


  #35  
Old January 17th 04, 03:52 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

Hey, Splaps. Next time you are ever near a DADC or it's diagram,
check out what they have at the other end of the tubing connected
to the fitting labeled *TOTAL*. Only ONE pitot tube!


Yep, the term Total means they added two sensors.

Catch this, Jimmy:

Since you started your childishness, you have trolled up three different
groups, with pretty much the same results.

Do you remember that old Gulf Aero DER that hung around in the pilot's
groups? Well, he read your stuff and got so stupid they fired him.

Next some poor tech at BF Goodrich got trolled up and removed the
temperature probe from the HS-125 700 ADC-80 changes. That cost them
hundreds of thousands of dollars in customer relations money.

And third, but not least, you trolled up Dudley and Shafer. Well wouldn't
you know, once Dudley got a conspiracy going with Mary's friends at Dryden,
the system **** out the two civil service slots and told Dryden to create a
basis for their funding. Well you know, those Dryden folks knew full well
they were making a living off someone else's past, but they hadn't realized
some of the people's work they made their living off of were contemporaries.
So old Ken Peterson, a personal friend of Dudley's, sat about and did not
create any basis, so now they have lost 1/3 of their budget. (ie $40million)

So, Jimmy, when I call your work an idiot detector, I really mean it.

Your's is a much nicer archive troll, as Miller is completely clueless about
the subject.


  #36  
Old January 17th 04, 03:54 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"B2431" wrote in message
...
Tarver, why not? You do it all the time.


Not me, little troll.


  #37  
Old January 17th 04, 03:55 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"B2431" wrote in message
...

On every aircraft I ever worked on thermocouples were in parallel if there

were
two or more.


What engine shop did you work in, Dan?


  #38  
Old January 17th 04, 04:17 PM
Jim Yanik
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(B2431) wrote in
:

From: Jim Yanik

Date: 1/16/2004 6:53 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

"John R Weiss" wrote in
news:Sp%Nb.73504$nt4.98595@attbi_s51:

"Phil Miller" wrote...

Yes really, on every jet engine TIT is Total Inlet Temperature.

Yep.

I ask because I came across an interesting paragraph in the
T56-A-15 service manual yesterday. Went like this...

...measures the turbine inlet temperature by means of
thermocouples...Eighteen thermocouple assemblies are mounted in the
turbine inlet casing of each engine...One thermocouple of each
assembly is connected to the turbine inlet temperature indicating
system, and...one...is connected to the electronic datum control
system. The 18 indicating system thermocouples are connected in
parallel [!!] by the indicator turbine thermocouple harness
assembly,

I'm surprised you ever doubted the truth on this one!


So, let's revise.

That's going a bit too far... Nobody can revise the Tarver
Chronicles! :-)


bimetallic thermocouples generate millivolt signals,and paralleling
them would not work.Standard practice is to series-connect them,and
compare to a reference junction.Do these assemblies include signal
processing to convert the mV signal to a digital form,which could then
be sent on a parallel bus?

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net

On every aircraft I ever worked on thermocouples were in parallel if
there were two or more.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


Well,I guess they aren't bimetallic thermocouples,then.
Anyone have any speculation on what sort of signal will work with a
parallel connection?

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net
  #39  
Old January 17th 04, 04:18 PM
Jim Yanik
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Rick wrote in
ink.net:

Jim Yanik wrote:

bimetallic thermocouples generate millivolt signals,and paralleling
them would not work.


You can go back to sleep now.

Rick


Well,that was an informative post.Best you could do,I suppose.
'plonk'.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net
  #40  
Old January 17th 04, 04:19 PM
running with scissors
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Phil Miller" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 07:13:54 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"Phil Miller" wrote in message
news
Hey Splappy,

Do you remember this series of pronouncements;

From: "Tarver Engineering"
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.military
Subject: Do Hercules military aircraft use the same fuel as

civilian
aircraft?
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 19:19:37 -0800
snip
wrote in message
Not really. On the T56 engine TIT = (T)urbine (I)nlet (T)empreture.

Yes really, on every jet engine TIT is Total Inlet Temperature.

Yep.


I ask because I came across an interesting paragraph in the T56-A-15
service manual yesterday. Went like this...


Same for any MM, the data does not need to be accurate.


grief !
so if that were the case, then a generic manual would suffice.
heck ! why bother, why not use the manual for a 1957 ford zeypher instead


Any engine temperature station using more than one probe is a Total.

That is how it works.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch Paul Home Built 0 October 18th 04 10:14 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 April 5th 04 03:04 PM
Hercules Engines Tarver Engineering Home Built 0 January 19th 04 11:05 PM
Accident Statistics: Certified vs. Non-Certified Engines Ron Wanttaja Home Built 23 January 18th 04 05:36 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 July 4th 03 04:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.