![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 22, 12:35*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote: Electric cars can now go from 150 - 200 miles on a single charge. In you imagination. http://www.wlwt.com/r/17226175/detail.html Or in other words, they are looking for investor money and the only car that exists is a one off, hand made, prototype. How do you know how many they've made thus far? Why do you think prototyping isn't the standard method? Automotive Prototyping- "The design process for new or improved automotive parts or assemblies includes the important step of producing, examining, and testing a physical prototype." http://www.protocam.com/html/automotive.html Why, if they only want money, would they have actually performed advanced electrical engineering and applied mathematics which solved the difficult criteria to satisfy this remarkable threshold which the world community has requested and which they have already been paid for? Why prove an advanced breakthrough which has all the funded support one could want from the executive branch of our govt? Wouldn't it be much, much more lucrative to simply engineer wickets and gizmos and hawk them on infomercials like Ron Popeil? Why do you assert that everyone working on advanced new technology involving renewable resources is a disingenuous charlatan? If all these people are insincere liars and thieves, why doesn't the general accounting office or a consumer protection advocacy group file lawsuits against to stop this pilfering of our tax dollars? Are you unable to see any advantages to this described and proven technology if battery technology was superior to fossil fuels, even if viewed hypothetically? --- Mark |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark wrote:
On Sep 22, 12:35Â*pm, wrote: Mark wrote: Electric cars can now go from 150 - 200 miles on a single charge. In you imagination. http://www.wlwt.com/r/17226175/detail.html Or in other words, they are looking for investor money and the only car that exists is a one off, hand made, prototype. How do you know how many they've made thus far? Because I can read and you can't. From your own link: "Only one prototype has been produced" "the car to travel 150 miles on one battery charge" So, there is one car, not "cars", that is a prototype that maybe can go 150 miles on a single charge, not "go from 150 - 200 miles" as you stated. Troll. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 22, 2:13*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote: On Sep 22, 12:35*pm, wrote: Mark wrote: Electric cars can now go from 150 - 200 miles on a single charge. In you imagination. http://www.wlwt.com/r/17226175/detail.html Or in other words, they are looking for investor money and the only car that exists is a one off, hand made, prototype. How do you know how many they've made thus far? Because I can read and you can't. From your own link: "Only one prototype has been produced" "the car to travel 150 miles on one battery charge" So, there is one car, not "cars", There was one car made at the time that website was released. But you claim, "There is only one car in existence." So I ask you, how do you know how many more cars they've made now? And furthermore, I didn't bother to post other cars that match or exceed that performance. There are many. So, how do you know there is only one in existence? Simple question. Cite. that is a prototype that maybe can go 150 miles on a single charge, not "go from 150 - 200 miles" as you stated. I never said that car could get 200 miles on a single charge. I was referring to different electric cars. Having comprehension problems? Troll. Sour grapes. Trolls cross-post to garner the largest possible audience. I don't. Trolls cannot stand on facts. I can. (you can't) Trolls use many different identities to hide behind their cowardice. I use one name. It is Mark. That is my name. Furthermore, a search of the archives of your posting will uncover at least one thread where a nice gentleman is trying to discuss something with you, and with every post he submits, your stock "bully" answer to that nice man was, "You're an idiot", and "You're still an idiot". You see Jimmy boy, you're basically a bully. You seek out folks that you think you can bully around. I knew this from the get-go. I suckered you in to give you this whipping. What I failed to tell you...is that my I.Q. is probably double yours. You will never win against me. And furthermore, I will readily admit when I'm wrong. You can't do that, so you keep shoveling, trying to get to the top of the hole. I'm a very low time pilot. You've got me beat there hands down. Congratulations. My time-machine is in the shop. --- Mark "No one can modify a LSA!" - Jim Perrino "Anyone can modify an LSA" - Federal Aviation Administration -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark wrote:
On Sep 22, 2:13Â*pm, wrote: Mark wrote: On Sep 22, 12:35Â*pm, wrote: Mark wrote: Electric cars can now go from 150 - 200 miles on a single charge. In you imagination. http://www.wlwt.com/r/17226175/detail.html Or in other words, they are looking for investor money and the only car that exists is a one off, hand made, prototype. How do you know how many they've made thus far? Because I can read and you can't. From your own link: "Only one prototype has been produced" "the car to travel 150 miles on one battery charge" So, there is one car, not "cars", There was one car made at the time that website was released. But you claim, "There is only one car in existence." So I ask you, how do you know how many more cars they've made now? You really should read your own links. They never planned to build cars, they were going to retrofit Saturns. Saturn halted production on October 1, 2009. And furthermore, I didn't bother to post other cars that match or exceed that performance. There are many. So you keep saying, but if you could actually find any, you would post them and go neener, neener, neener. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 22, 5:12*pm, wrote:
And furthermore, I didn't bother to post other cars that match or exceed that performance. There are many. So you keep saying, but if you could actually find any, you would post them and go neener, neener, neener. Not interested. The 150 mile technology is old news. The 200 mile technology is old news. Boring old news. Yes there are other 150 mile cars, such as this: http://www.fashionfunky.com/2008/07/...0_miles_fo.php This doesn't interest me. The Tesla Motors Model S line...goes 300 miles. That's respectable. What I've been hollerin' about for the future, is something like 500 miles on a single charge. The project is ambitious but the science is sound. http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/aroun...-63290817.html --- Mark -- Jim Pennino |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 23, 1:51*am, Mark wrote:
What I've been hollerin' about for the future, is something like 500 miles on a single charge. *The project is ambitious but the science is sound. http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/aroun...c_car_batterie... --- Meant to use this source. http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/22780/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 23, 1:56*am, Mark wrote:
Meant to use this source. http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/22780/ Remember my theoretical cessna 152 scenerio, that flys above flight levels? With neglible battery weight, yet seemingly unlimited power? You know, the "preposterous" idea that only a ridiculous starry eyed person would think? Looks like I'm not alone. http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/2780/ --- Mark |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark wrote:
On Sep 23, 1:56Â*am, Mark wrote: Meant to use this source. http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/22780/ Remember my theoretical cessna 152 scenerio, that flys above flight levels? With neglible battery weight, yet seemingly unlimited power? You know, the "preposterous" idea that only a ridiculous starry eyed person would think? Looks like I'm not alone. http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/2780/ Yet another broken link. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark wrote:
On Sep 23, 1:51Â*am, Mark wrote: What I've been hollerin' about for the future, is something like 500 miles on a single charge. Â*The project is ambitious but the science is sound. http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/aroun...c_car_batterie... --- Meant to use this source. http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/22780/ It has been over a year, where's the batteries? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark wrote:
On Sep 22, 5:12Â*pm, wrote: And furthermore, I didn't bother to post other cars that match or exceed that performance. There are many. So you keep saying, but if you could actually find any, you would post them and go neener, neener, neener. Not interested. The 150 mile technology is old news. The 200 mile technology is old news. Boring old news. In other words, there is nothing in production that makes even the 120 miles you claim. People can't drive press releases about one off prototypes. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion | Mark | Piloting | 81 | September 22nd 10 05:40 PM |
IFR GPS replace DME / ADF? | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | May 15th 06 03:13 PM |
H2 Combustion-Booster Claimed | [email protected] | Home Built | 44 | October 12th 05 04:14 AM |
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 265 | March 7th 04 09:28 AM |
high-speed camera view of a piston intake, combustion, exhaust | R.Hubbell | General Aviation | 0 | February 20th 04 03:36 AM |