A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Type of logbook entry required



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old July 31st 14, 04:28 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Doug Mueller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 46
Default Type of logbook entry required

At 02:13 31 July 2014, son_of_flubber wrote:
On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 5:28:28 PM UTC-4, Steve Freeman

wrote:
I have an SZD55 flying under an experimental/exhibition

certificate in
the US. It was manufactured at the factory in Poland.

On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 9:53:16 PM UTC-4,

wrote:
Guide to Maintaining A Homebuilt Aircraft

.....
I hope this clarifies some of the confusion that is out there.


For busha's post to clarify the confusion, an aircraft 'manufactured

at the
factory in Poland' and a 'Homebuilt Aircraft' would have to be the

same
thing.


The correct answer is contact your local FSDO and tell them what
you have done and then ask them for guidance and see what you
get. You will find a different answer from each FSDO. As a
messenger only, I encourage you to contact an A&P and stay away
from the FAA and stop posting on public forum what you have done
to your aircraft.
The advice on this thread lacks research and study. It only counts
anyway when you have an accident and insurance will be looking to
figure out who to point the finger at. Untill then go for it guys. So
short sided!

  #12  
Old August 1st 14, 10:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 49
Default Type of logbook entry required

On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 2:28:28 PM UTC-7, Steve Freeman wrote:
I have an SZD55 flying under an experimental/exhibition certificate in the US. It was manufactured at the factory in Poland. I have made some changes to the instrumentation in the panel and a few other items. Can anyone confirm that all that is required by the FAA is a logbook entry by myself stating what was done followed by my signature and pilot certificate number and then a statement by an IA explaining they supervised the work and their signature etc.


An A+P can sign this off and you can do the work but you should have an A+P working with you and following along. I have no problem signing off work others have done if I know them and they get with me ahead of time so I can review what and how they are going to do the work but you will need to have it signed off by an A+P. Read your operating limitations you should find somthing in there about alterations.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
(USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type? Tuno Soaring 19 April 1st 11 04:23 PM
(USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type? 5Z Soaring 0 April 1st 11 05:02 AM
Parachute Required by Type Certificate [email protected] Soaring 1 April 28th 09 12:15 AM
ELT Required for all SSA sanctioned contests starting 2006 ELT Required for all SSA sanctione Steve Leonard Soaring 2 September 14th 05 04:49 AM
New GPS installs now with only a logbook entry! Dennis O'Connor Owning 2 January 27th 04 08:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.