A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Open Class



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old February 21st 15, 01:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,124
Default Open Class

On Saturday, February 21, 2015 at 1:49:46 AM UTC-5, Bruce Hoult wrote:
On Saturday, February 21, 2015 at 5:09:07 PM UTC+13, Bob Kuykendall wrote:
On Friday, February 13, 2015 at 9:49:02 PM UTC-8, Bruce Hoult wrote:

...but they lose badly to the new thin airfoils at high speed...


It's kind of a nitpick, but there's really nothing new about thin airfoils. What has changed in the last decade and a half is the cost-effectiveness of the structure required to implement them in competitive sailplanes.


Sure, carbon spars enabled them.


Spars AND skins. Torsional stiffness is a big consideration in these structures.
UH
  #22  
Old February 21st 15, 09:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Mike the Strike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 952
Default Open Class

I owned a Jantar-1 many years ago. From the weight of each wing panel, I surmise that the main spar was a steel girder, probably a recycled railway line. Modern technology enables thinner, lighter, stronger structures (and no steel girders!)

Mike
  #23  
Old February 21st 15, 10:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,383
Default Open Class

On Saturday, February 21, 2015 at 4:04:19 PM UTC-5, Mike the Strike wrote:
I owned a Jantar-1 many years ago. From the weight of each wing panel, I surmise that the main spar was a steel girder, probably a recycled railway line. Modern technology enables thinner, lighter, stronger structures (and no steel girders!)

Mike


Ever rig a Diamant 16.5? The list of who has done it once is long, the list for twice+ is VERY short....
I'm on the short list (used to crew for pay & food...)
  #24  
Old February 24th 15, 09:01 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 278
Default Open Class

Steve Leonard: When it comes to glider wings how much cumulative span do you own right now? :-)

The newer ships going to shorter wings and the advantages and disadvantages of doing so is something that fascinates me. Mind you, with the amount of money I have it's not something that will have any relevance to my buying decisions unless I win a lottery! Someday I hope to move from 15 meters to 20 meters by replacing my ASW-15 with an ASW-17 but that's about as far as I'm ever likely to be able to go.
  #26  
Old February 24th 15, 02:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Andy Gough[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24
Default Open Class


Ah, skill, that sets the cat among the pigeons.

Where can I buy that and is there a preferred supplier?


On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at 7:00:05 AM UTC-5, Chris Rollings wrote:
The newer ships have a higher minumum circling speed and therefore need a
slightly higher level of skill to maximise climb rate but they go better at
high speeds. This statement has been true since the 1930's

At 09:01 24 February 2015, wrote:
Steve Leonard: When it comes to glider wings how much cumulative span do
yo=
u own right now? :-)

The newer ships going to shorter wings and the advantages and
disadvantages=
of doing so is something that fascinates me. Mind you, with the amount

of
=
money I have it's not something that will have any relevance to my buying
d=
ecisions unless I win a lottery! Someday I hope to move from 15 meters to
2=
0 meters by replacing my ASW-15 with an ASW-17 but that's about as far as
I=
'm ever likely to be able to go.




On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at 7:00:05 AM UTC-5, Chris Rollings wrote:
The newer ships have a higher minumum circling speed and therefore need a
slightly higher level of skill to maximise climb rate but they go better at
high speeds. This statement has been true since the 1930's

At 09:01 24 February 2015,
wrote:
Steve Leonard: When it comes to glider wings how much cumulative span do
yo=
u own right now? :-)

The newer ships going to shorter wings and the advantages and
disadvantages=
of doing so is something that fascinates me. Mind you, with the amount

of
=
money I have it's not something that will have any relevance to my buying
d=
ecisions unless I win a lottery! Someday I hope to move from 15 meters to
2=
0 meters by replacing my ASW-15 with an ASW-17 but that's about as far as
I=
'm ever likely to be able to go.

  #27  
Old February 25th 15, 07:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Chris Rollings[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 133
Default Open Class

Your namesake was one of the best suppliers in the World, sadly, no longer
with us.

At 14:41 24 February 2015, Andy Gough wrote:

Ah, skill, that sets the cat among the pigeons.

Where can I buy that and is there a preferred supplier?


On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at 7:00:05 AM UTC-5, Chris Rollings wrote:
The newer ships have a higher minumum circling speed and therefore need

a
slightly higher level of skill to maximise climb rate but they go

better
at
high speeds. This statement has been true since the 1930's

At 09:01 24 February 2015, wrote:
Steve Leonard: When it comes to glider wings how much cumulative span

do
yo=
u own right now? :-)

The newer ships going to shorter wings and the advantages and
disadvantages=
of doing so is something that fascinates me. Mind you, with the

amount
of
=
money I have it's not something that will have any relevance to my

buying
d=
ecisions unless I win a lottery! Someday I hope to move from 15 meters

to
2=
0 meters by replacing my ASW-15 with an ASW-17 but that's about as far

as
I=
'm ever likely to be able to go.




On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at 7:00:05 AM UTC-5, Chris Rollings wrote:
The newer ships have a higher minumum circling speed and therefore need

a
slightly higher level of skill to maximise climb rate but they go

better
at
high speeds. This statement has been true since the 1930's

At 09:01 24 February 2015,
wrote:
Steve Leonard: When it comes to glider wings how much cumulative span

do
yo=
u own right now? :-)

The newer ships going to shorter wings and the advantages and
disadvantages=
of doing so is something that fascinates me. Mind you, with the

amount
of
=
money I have it's not something that will have any relevance to my

buying
d=
ecisions unless I win a lottery! Someday I hope to move from 15 meters

to
2=
0 meters by replacing my ASW-15 with an ASW-17 but that's about as far

as
I=
'm ever likely to be able to go.



  #28  
Old February 25th 15, 12:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Jock Proudfoot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 91
Default Open Class

At 14:41 24 February 2015,

Andy Gough wrote:
Ah, skill, that sets the cat among the pigeons.
Where can I buy that and is there a preferred supplier?

Check your DNA . . Cheers Jock
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WGC Open Class Richard Walters Soaring 1 August 12th 12 05:14 PM
Should SSA Regional contests allow water in FAI class...15, 18, 20,Open class? Sean Fidler Soaring 25 December 16th 11 02:14 PM
Open Class Nationals [email protected] Soaring 6 July 12th 05 05:05 PM
DAY 4 U.S. Open Class Nationals [email protected] Soaring 3 July 3rd 05 03:24 PM
UK Open Class and Club Class Nationals - Lasham Steve Dutton Soaring 0 August 6th 03 10:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.