![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well that totally sucks. I use a 302 as primary and an EW for backup. If those recorders have been sufficiently secure for the past ten years, what makes them suddenly unacceptable come Jan 1 ?
I don’t know about the EW, but I do know alot of guys are still using a 302. Sounds like more bull**** designed to make us buy new gear. IGC sure likes to screw things up. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IGC-approval of two new types of recorder | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 0 | June 15th 08 05:41 PM |
IGC-approval issued for two types of DSX recorder | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 4 | April 13th 08 05:01 PM |
IGC-approval levels for some types of Flight Recorders | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 42 | March 19th 05 05:42 PM |
Updated IGC-approval documents for some types of GPS Recorders | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 1 | April 13th 04 03:23 AM |
Date of effect now 1 April 2004 for revised IGC-approval for certain legacy types of GNSS flight recorder | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 56 | December 2nd 03 08:08 AM |