![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed's numbers look pretty good to me. But another factor is what the
peculiar requirements of your situation is. I was a little miffed at TAC because they used a six-month cycle in which you flew (not necessarily in this order) air intercepts (radar work), air to ground conventional, air to ground nuke, air to ground night, air combat maneuvers followed by air combat tactics. Air refuling was mixed with (usually) air to ground nuke and air to ground night. But the problem was just about as soon as you got 'happy' with what yoyu were doing the mission changed. The other thing was instrument cross-check. here is where a good (!) simulator helps a lot, to stay sharp. In was once caught out; I'd been off 90 days TDY and when I got back about the second missionwas flying as chase on a pilot in the combat crew training phase. The wx lowered and we had to make separate GCAs. I was all over the place compared to my usual proficiency. The lesson was duly noted and I started scrounging sim rides when I sensed they were needed rather than dodging the box as if it were radioactive. FWIW I needed 3 act rides a week to be able to fly act automatically. I would guess that 3 good busy practices rides a month would keep you proficient enough to fly around the pattern on a severely clear VFR day. That means accomplishing the various training items you must keep proficient in, like approaches, ILS and non-p, plus the VFR pattern. This also includes, on the side, reviewing the flight manual religiously and knowing the EPs and limitations exactly plus 'blindfold familiarity' with the cockpit - be able to reach out and touch and identify without fumbling every gauge and control in the cockpit. (Note that this will not furnish enough proficiency to safely fly at night!) The USAF beginning about 1965 had us write out the EPs out verbatim before each and every flight. I consider this level of knowledge and cockpit familiarity to absolutely necessary for any high-performance flying. Unfortunately, as Ed points out, time per se isn't worth much. The USAF for a long time tried to get DOD and Congress to buy off on sorties rather than aircraft time as far as appropriations went. The pols couldn't understand that approach, unfortunately, since maximum performance flying eats up fuel and there goes the 1.5+ flight. Also, a heavy emphasis on max performance leads to a lot of hole-boring near the end of the month to log the monthly total and avoid nasty notes from HHQ. That's why a couple squadrons I was in really liked to send guys out on XCs over the weekend. 4 planes flying seven sorties each in cruise mode at altitude boost the average time per sortie significantly. One takeoff, climb out, cruise letdown and approach wasn't a significant amount of training per sortie, but that 1:40 (F104) or 2:30 (F102) helped a lot towards the hour total. Made up for those AB-heavy missions where the lessons learned were weighty. (Learned some lessons on the XCs, too!) Walt BJ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
AF investigators cite pilot error in fighter crash | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 9th 04 09:55 PM |
Questions Regarding Becoming a Marine Fighter Pilot. ? Thanks! | Lee Shores | Military Aviation | 23 | December 11th 03 10:49 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation | Gilan | Home Built | 17 | September 24th 03 06:11 AM |