![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the photo shows the back of the TE attachment fittings. I
would say the tubing has come off. Easy fix. Get drawings, drill a hole in the side of the fin, reattach and repair the hole according to repair manual. Would require a licensed A&P to sign off. t 02:27 13 February 2020, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Wednesday, February 12, 2020 at 5:23:35 PM UTC-8, Dave Nadler wrote: On Wednesday, February 12, 2020 at 4:07:53 PM UTC-5, soaringjac wrote: https://photos.app.goo.gl/wu5LUibL2KpF9eWZ6 I have no idea what im looking at... =20 Clearly a Dr. Who rerun. Attack of the o-ring men? The Three o-rings? --- It's likely an o-ring. But so what. Looking in the hole may not tell you mu= ch, well not from a single photo. Again, take this to an experienced glider A&P and get help. Especially beca= use you are working on a type certificated aircraft and I am guessing you a= re not qualified to. A competent glider A&P will be able to determine exact= ly what is going on, what's leaking or cross leaking and then spend time tr= ying to find out where. They should be very experienced at trying to work o= ut if it's a faulty o-ring or probe or mount connection, or whatever and ha= ve the right tools to pick out and replace o-rings. maybe correct o-rings o= n hand, able to cut out and replace the probe mount if that is needed, etc.= etc. etc. You fix problems by fixing them, ideas of leaving TE lines faulty and tryin= g to use them as static are a waste of your time. "running out of time" is = the entirely wrong attitude here.=20 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lx9070 V80 and Butterfly electronic and pnuemantic compensation | Jonathan St. Cloud | Soaring | 2 | May 5th 16 06:47 PM |
Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation (conclusions) | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | September 26th 05 05:02 PM |
Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation (follow-up) | [email protected] | Soaring | 4 | September 20th 05 06:21 PM |
Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation (follow-up) | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | September 20th 05 06:04 AM |
Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 | [email protected] | Soaring | 8 | September 15th 05 02:49 AM |