![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not at all! In 1942 the tide was just beginning to turn against Germany. Far
from 'practcally defeated' Unlike Anglo led global alliance that had almost unlimited material and human resources,Germans had exteremely small resources,so when their advances were stopped or even slowed down only,they were basically defeated,they had no resources to fight a prolonged war. Your problem seems to be that you cannot distinguish between plans and realities. We all know about all the wonderful weapons that the different branches of the Third Reich had *planned*. Why Anglos did not and do not dispute the fact that,for example,Me262 and V-2 were developed by germans during the war? Because they were widely used during war and their existence was witnessed by the thousands of allied military personnel and civilians. I am pretty sure if they were not widely used during war and Anglos found only a couple of Me262 and V-2s in top secret underground production facilities,we would now be discussing whether Germans were able to develop fighter jets and ballistic missiles during WWII. Actually nuclear technology transfer from Germany to Anglo countries during last days of WWII and after WWII actually represented the low-end of the technology stolen from Germany. Other "wonderful weapons" that 3rd Reich planned became the basis for the advanced weapons US "developed" within last 60 years. Lets remember for the technology transfer you dont need always a component transfer,document transfer is many times sufficent. In reality, they struggled. This was the regime that never launched an aircraft carrier, and never built a convincing four-engined bomber. Whose leader fiddled away the days while his empire collapsed, sketching designs for post-war architectural projects There was NO conventional aircraft,aircraft carrier,submarine or tank project of 3rd Reich among S-Projects. During his visit to Klein-Machow facility in fall 44 Hitler was not even allowed to take his adjutant and personal bodyguard with him into the facility,much less fiddling with S-projects. It was more excusable for Eisenhower to proceed on worst-case assumptions about the German nuclear programme in 1944 than it is for you to believe it Since Ike is not alive now we cannot ask him why he wrote down that statement. 0 years later, when 60 years of research have failed to come up with any evidence at all for the things you are saying. What world heard in last 60 years was the story that victorious Anglos needed world to hear nothing else. What is an igniter? Triggering device that Dr.Alvares after inspecting U-234 cargo and debriefing U234s scientific passenger Dr.Schlicke made to work at the virtually last minute by "cleaning up some wires". (He was,like other MP scientists, unable to come up with working igniter design in previous 18 months,but never mind!) How would they have done that without the know-how they and the Nazis lacked? Are we to assume that both the Japanese and the Germans possessed the ability to make an 'igniter' (whatever that is) and yet the Americans did not? Japanase know how were coming from Germany. Unlike Von Ardenne/Houtermans group that recognized igniter problem at very early stage and started developing suitable igniter designs in late 41,Manhattan Project scientists recognized that problem very late and that was one of the major blunders of MP. So while Germans perfected their design,Manhattan Project was still trying to design one.period. German igniter was so excellent that yield of tested plutonium bomb exceeded even best predictions of Manhattan Project scientists by a big margin. Denyav, believe me, I like a good conspiracy theory as much as anyone. But where is your actual evidence for these beliefs? One thing we all know exactly is that all documents regarding this issue is classified for 75 years,inlcluding the log of the "regular" US army division that occupied one of the German nuclear development sites. So you must check the.correspondence between Anglo management to find first clues. 1)In March 45 powerful senators asking for the termination of Manhattan project because there was no way that they can produce bomb bt the deadline. 2)Even Manhattan projects top scientists predicted in early 45 that not enough uran will be available for the bomb. 3)Everthing went according to the their predictions till June but in June an unpredicted miracle happened.Uran production spiked !. 4)Groves and Anglo management tried to explain this spike in production but in close examination everything he said failed explain the spike.So where did the extra Uran come from? From outer space maybe? 5)Igniter story is even more ridicilous. We know that Manhattan Project recognized igniter problem very late and tried for 18 months to produce a working igniter design in vain. So Manhattan Project scientists main concern was not even the success of Plutonium bomb test but was how to collect precious plutonium from the test area after failed test. So they were pretty sure that igniter wont work. But test was a great success,the yield of the bomb exceeded even most optimistic expectations of Manhattan Projecters by a great margin. How Manhattan Project scientists made a such big prediction errror? Well in closer examination you will learn that this "excellent" igniter arrived only hours before actual test date and was "designed" by Dr.Alvares (later Nobel laurate). Problem is Dr.Alvares was trying to design an igniter for last 18 months without success,so how he came up with a revolutionary design at the virtually last minute? What Anglo management did not tell the world is that Dr.Alvares was the man who inspected U-234 cargo and debriefed Dr.Schlicke and Dr.Schlicke's duty was to help Japanese to assemble the bomb.period. After war Dr.Alvares always tried to dodge questions about igniter development for 40 years. When he was asked how he developed an excellent igniter and saved US nuclear program. His answer was always enlightening,"Well,I cleaned up some wires" I am sure his answer did not make von Ardenne happy. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hamas Leader Rantisi Killed by Israeli Strike on Car | Dav1936531 | Military Aviation | 13 | April 21st 04 07:04 PM |
Joint Strike Fighter focus sparks concern | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 19th 04 09:19 PM |
Mother Russia closer to develop an ABM system | Alejandro Magno | Military Aviation | 11 | January 11th 04 06:06 PM |
Russian Military Technology | Alejandro Magno | Military Aviation | 137 | January 10th 04 12:21 AM |
Russia joins France and Germany | captain! | Military Aviation | 12 | September 9th 03 09:56 AM |