![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ink.net... No, the reported ground visibility MUST be at least 1 statute mile. The pilot must request the contact approach and the airport must have a functioning IAP as well. A local field with part-time tower (Class D airspace when tower is open) has restricted areas in close proximity. When these areas are active, ATC will not approve the SIAPs. There is no notation on the approach plate, nor any NOTAM, that says the approaches are not allowed when the restricted areas are active. There is no AWOS/ASOS reporting over the radio or telephone, but recently the field began putting METARs into the system. I don't know if the tower personnel are certified weather observers or not, so I don't know if their observations qualify as "reported" visibility, nor do I know if the METAR visibility report qualifies as "reported ground visibility". I was hoping someone knew of some rule that allowed a substitute for an official ground visibility report. There is certified weather observing at a larger field five miles away, but I don't suppose that would do. When the restricted areas are active, there is no way to get back into the field in IMC other than a visual or contact approach. MVA is 2400 MSL, about 1700 AGL. Well, there may be two. One is to fly the ILS into the adjacent Class C airspace, then cancel and maneuver around the restricted areas at 1000 AGL if cloud conditions permit, which would require 3 miles visibility. The other possibility is that there is a PAR approach available sometimes. I haven't asked if they will approve it when the restricted areas are active. The problem, I think, is the missed approach. Circling is not allowed east of the runway due to terrain, and for the two published IAPs, the missed goes on the west side, which is where one of the restricted areas is. Since there is no published missed for the PAR approach, or for a visual or contact approach, I don't know what they will do. I have flown a visual into the field when the ceiling was overcast at 2400 MSL, but it was a stretch to say I had the field in sight. A contact approach would have been better. I think I just need to go talk to these people. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPS approach question | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 08 03:54 AM |
Contact approach question | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 114 | January 31st 05 06:40 PM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | April 2nd 04 11:13 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |