Pearl Harbor Defense

Answer the question.


Less than 20% is the percentage of Anglo-Americans in US acc.to census figures

It's not interesting. The quote you provided was incomplete,
ungrammatical and incomprehensible. You obviously don't understand what
"Incomprehensible" means. Write it again exactly the way Rhodes said

I dont know if you like it but:

The quote was taken from John Flints book "Cecil Rhodes" published in 1976.
If you want to see full version of Rhodes' 1876 "Confession of Faith" you
better check out this book.
The Author has published the both versions of Rhodes' "will" ,one written by
himself in his own handwriting,other written by his clerk .
If you read the book we might get somewhere possibly.

No Sir,famous and for some dreaded CFR is nothing but the American Branch
or
loudspeaker of not so famous British roundtable group.

What?

Well,for more information I strongly recommend you to read Bill Clintons
mentor Carroll Quigley's book "The Anglo-American establisment"

Highly Secretive "Round Table Group" is behind of the current events in the
world,and our famous CFR is nothing but a loudspeaker for this secretive group.

What's wrong with that method? Most people had no education at all
before that. India had, and still has, so many languages that a common
tongue was needed to unify the country.

If I remember correctly the motto of the Empire was "Divide and Rule" not
"Unite and Rule"
So,the reason behind the introduction of English in colonies must be anything
BUT unification.

Existing social structures in India were repressive and exploitative.
Foe all its faults, the British ||Empire did improve the lot of the
people there.

Sounds like you are describing existing social structures in Britain at that
time.For example in India,Empire tried to terminate elite Brahmin caste all
methods.

Untrue.



Unfortunately true,Empire did everything imaginable to eliminate Brahmins,which
were Indias best educated elite and tried to replace them with a new
"nomenclature" educated in British founded schools and with "Gazzetta
Officers".

pretty hard to be friendly with the
peasants,even though polish elite was much closer to the Nazis "Superhuman"
picture than peasants.

Hardly a valid comparison.

Why? .Replace Brits with Germans and Brahmins with Polish then you have exactly
the same picture.

Soerry to disappoint you, but look at the number of people around the
world who received an education courtesy of Pax Britannica.

I wonder why there is not even one former British colony among G-7 or 8
countries whereas countries that were not fortunate enough to receive an
education courtesy of Pax Britannia,for example Japan,are among the most
developed,even though some former colonies were more developed than Japan
before they received education courtesy of Pax Brittannia?

I also wonder why many of worlds current hot spots,if not all, are the
countries that were fortunane enough to receive an education courtesy of Pax
Britannia?

Any explanations greatly appreciated.

What you called "education" is a brainwashing program designed de-root
colonized people and to make them the obedient servants of their colonial
masters.

Rubbish.
That was the way the Anglo empire (and others) work.

So the only reason people gave up their lives in their homeland was to
exercise their perversions overseas? Great reasoning, and untrue.
Victorian Britain was not at all puritan behind closed doors.

Surely it was not only reason but one of the reasons

..But you said that the Nazis were set up by tne future Allies in the
first place.

You possibly could not find anybody with less IQ than Nazis in Germany at that
time.


Then why didn't the war start in 1938 at the time of the Munich
Agreement?

This date was too early,even Idiots like Nazi management could see it.

And you do know what's happening? How?

If I lived in Anglo homeland ,I would not want to learn that.

What?

Why Sir David (David King) got involved in a nasty discussion with George W. ?,

What about could possibly our Prez without stellar IQ number discuss with
Britains top "official" scientists?.

Why the discussion turned nasty and Mr.Blair got a complain about that?