![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Red" wrote in message m... Going strictly on how things were in 1963 the best fighter at the time was the F-8. The F-4 which became a great fighter in its own right wasn't one at that time. The F-4 was an interceptor which is not the same as a fighter. The F-8 community practiced fighter tactics from missile range down to knife fighting range. The F-4 practiced radar intercepts and firing BVR. A good example was how the F-4's and F-8's greeted the Bears in the North Atlantic. F-4's would approach from behind and slide into position on the bears wing. The F-8 would announce their presence with a vertical pass (aka thumping). Does this mean that the F-4 had a better radar and missile fit but the F-8 could out dogfight? Going strictly by 1963 that is. From what I've read the 1963 F-4 radar and missile systems were pretty bad. The early sidewinders could only lock on to a read-view jet exhaust and could be distracted by almost anything (sun, lake, etc.) The Sparrow could not shoot anything below the shooter. But what do I know, maybe the F-8 was worse. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 106 | May 12th 04 07:18 AM |
Why was the Fokker D VII A Good Plane? | Matthew G. Saroff | Military Aviation | 111 | May 4th 04 05:34 PM |
A-4 / A-7 Question | Tank Fixer | Military Aviation | 135 | October 25th 03 03:59 AM |
The end of the Naval Air Reserves??? | John Larson | Naval Aviation | 22 | July 6th 03 03:31 AM |
Joint Russian-French 5th generation fighter? | lihakirves | Military Aviation | 1 | July 5th 03 01:36 AM |