![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/4/03 12:37 PM, in article
, "James Woody" wrote: Yep - RIO (running into obsolesce). 2 pair of eyes was always better than one. Woody Woody, In the air-to-air arena, I've never found the two sets of eyes in the Tomcat (or the Strike Eagle for that matter) to be an advantage against single-seat fighters at the merge. Been there many times against Tomcats when the Toms are tally 0 (red or blue) and the Hornets are tally all (blue or red). In fact, I see "no joy's" out of Tomcats way more than out of Hornets. Don't take that as NFO bashing. I've got a lot of respect for B/N's, WSO's, and RIO's in the systems weapons and sensor supported weapons roles. It's great to have one guy totally focused on target acq and weapons support leaving the pilot to flying form and avoiding the threat. I just think that their additional utility (given current technology) in the air-to-air arena is limited. I'm sure I'm going to get many responses from this one. Seriously, folks, not a troll. --Woody |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New aviation history interview: Fokker/Curtiss/Messerschmitt ace Mauno Fräntilä | Jukka O. Kauppinen | Military Aviation | 0 | September 22nd 04 11:18 PM |
MILITARY HISTORY BOOKS | Robert Hansen | Military Aviation | 0 | February 19th 04 02:10 AM |
Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements | me | Military Aviation | 146 | January 15th 04 10:13 PM |
F-14 on the History Channel's "Modern Marvels" | Brian J. McCann | Military Aviation | 15 | October 12th 03 02:12 PM |
FS: Aviation History Books | Neil Cournoyer | Military Aviation | 0 | August 26th 03 08:32 PM |