![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "puttster" wrote in message om... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... By ship , C-130 or other battlefield airlift asset. Keith I might could buy resupply with C-130's . They are STOL themselves, landing fully loaded in under 500 ft. We would need a lot of them though, to set up a deep mission. Which is why we have em Maybe a situation like OIF where Turkey would not let the Army come in from the north. With enough C-130's maybe you could quickly set up a wing of F-35B's up in Kurdistan, with a regiment of Marines to support them. The thing is though there were usable airstrips there already. Not many in point of fact and that isnt always the case. Even if there weren't any, the first C-130's should be bringing in the runway, then you could bring in C-5's for supply and you could build twice the force in the same amount of time. Any your fighters could have normal range and loads. And what pray tell is protecting the C-5's and C-130's in the meantime ? Plus it never ceases to amaze me the number of folks who think that (a) bringing in enough aluminum matting (and we don't use PSP anymore) to build a fighter strip is a piece of cake (and trying to support a C-5 on one is a mean proposition), (b) installing the matting is all there is to it (no cut/fill, drainage work, or subbabse and base course prep required), getting the requisite engineer equipment and units into the site is an easy matter, and (d) this will all happen over a matter of a day or two. Laying in a fighter-length strip from scaratch is a *major* engineer operation, and quite different from that required to construct a minimum length rough field C-130 strip. f-35B's seem like an Idea without a mission to me. The RAF , RN and USMC disagree Add the USAF to that equation--they just officially announced that they are interested in revamping their programmed buy to include some B models as well. Brooks Well, maybe some isolated rescue stuff, but what do the marines need 400 of them for? I could see two dozen maybe, to go along with their Ospreys. That should be it. Lacking either a crystal ball for perfect prediction or the ability to limit the forces an enemy can bring to bear I disagree There are a lot of even 3rd world airforces that can bring more than a dozen modern fighters to a hot spot. Keith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Replace fabric with glass | Ernest Christley | Home Built | 38 | April 17th 04 11:37 AM |
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 265 | March 7th 04 09:28 AM |
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? | Guy Alcala | Naval Aviation | 2 | February 22nd 04 06:22 AM |
RAN to get new LSD class vessel to replace 5 logistic vessels ... | Aerophotos | Military Aviation | 10 | November 3rd 03 11:49 PM |
Air Force to replace enlisted historians with civilians | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 1 | October 22nd 03 09:41 AM |