![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JL Grasso wrote:
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 21:40:20 +0000, Pooh Bear wrote: So the radio altimeter was accurate ? I think not. And that was known to be one of the weak spots in the A320's systems at that time IIRC. I'm guessing that Capt Asseline realised that the radar altimeter was malfunctioning and reverted to baro readings. Regds, Graham You need to know that at 12:45:11, the aircraft was still well off the airport area by several thousand yards. They were over a hilly, partially-forested area (Hardt Forest) to the right of the approach end of runway 02 (which was the actual runway they were supposed to parallel during the flyover). Ahh - the problem with the briefing ! You should also know that radar altimeters report the distance between the transceiver antennas and any objects below. Yes indeed - I do. So, if the topography of the area below varies, or the altitude varies, the readings change nearly immediately. Agreed. So let's check the topography then ? The flight path etc. From my own experience, that general area is pretty flat but I'm interested in seeing any info. Changes in the attitude of the aircraft can sometimes have effects on the readings also. I can see that too - indeed you could possibly call it a deficiency of rad alts. This is something that an experienced Captain would know, and something a planespotter would not. Can't resist being Bertei's pal ? If only I had the time to go spot planes ! Last time I had a look-around I saw some nice kit at Panshanger. I'd rather spend my time 'spotting' attractive women - and getting to know them actually. If you would actually read something comprehensive concerning this accident, you could see that the RadAlt was consistent while over the relatively level terrain of the airfield - just as one would expect. Indeed it is. I also assume that if the radar altimeter was broken, it would have been deferred MMEL and cited as such in the investigation. I never asserted it was broken. Simply that the implementation at that time in the A320 had given rise to concerns about its accuracy. Actually - you succeeded in diverting my attention from what I consider to be one of the more intruiging aspects of this crash - notably a suggested compressor stall. Graham |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Replace fabric with glass | Ernest Christley | Home Built | 38 | April 17th 04 11:37 AM |
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 265 | March 7th 04 09:28 AM |
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? | Guy Alcala | Naval Aviation | 2 | February 22nd 04 06:22 AM |
RAN to get new LSD class vessel to replace 5 logistic vessels ... | Aerophotos | Military Aviation | 10 | November 3rd 03 11:49 PM |
Air Force to replace enlisted historians with civilians | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 1 | October 22nd 03 09:41 AM |