![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() My vote: TACTOM on Collins class subs. "Henry J Cobb" wrote in message ... The Raven wrote: There's a couple of issues here. 1. What is the current capability requirement of the F-111? 2. Is that capability requirement still relevant? 3. Is there a more effective means of meeting that capability, perhaps in a different role? 4. Assuming the same capabilities are required, does anything do that? http://f-111.net/CarloKopp/Defence-News-2908-P8.pdf The idea of killing off the F-111 amounts to killing off the potential political payoffs from its use in coalition campaigns, and if substituted with smaller aircraft, imposes an extra burden on the US tanker fleet. The alliance issues arising in the PacRim from the loss of the F-111 are thus repeated on the global scene. -HJC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Australian Army torture claims surface | Aerophotos | Military Aviation | 16 | May 15th 04 09:23 AM |
Australia to participate in US missile defence program | David Bromage | Military Aviation | 40 | December 13th 03 01:52 PM |
This month in Australian Military aviation | Dave Kearton | Military Aviation | 0 | November 6th 03 02:30 AM |
U.S., Australian airmen defend base | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | November 4th 03 09:52 PM |
Australia tries to rewrite history of Vietnam War | Evan Brennan | Military Aviation | 34 | July 18th 03 11:45 PM |