![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Mike Weeks) wrote:
(Issac Goldberg) wrote: [snip] (Mike Weeks) wrote: http://libertyincident.com/documents.htm Finally! After lots of name calling, changing the subject and non sequiturs, Weeks gives a source which he alleges contains information concerning Congress investigating the Liberty and concluding that the attack was an accident. Idiot; Weeks does what he does best, he resorts to childish name calling. If he had a strong case, there would be no reason for his constant insults, his arguments alone would carry the day. But, considering how often he engages in name calling, his case must be very, very weak. He acknowledges that Congress has never conducted an investigation devoted solely to the Liberty affair. Congress did investigate a single aspect of the Liberty incident, relating to DOD communications, which did not look at the question of whether the attack by Israel was intentional. In fact, none of the links provided by Cristol is to a Congressional investigation into the question, "was that attack on the USS Liberty intentional?" Weeks, if I am wrong, please provide a link to a Congressional investigation which looked into whether the attack on the USS Liberty was intentional. You can't, because Congress never conducted such an investigation. To say that Congress never found evidence that the attack was intentional is being disingenuous. If there was no investigation, then there was no conclusion. But to imply that Congress thoroughly investigated the Liberty affair, and to further imply that this investigation exonerated Israel, is the kind of dishonesty recently practiced by President Bush in convincing our country to invade Iraq. Bush can accurately say that he never directly accused Saddam of being behind 9/11, but his implications were so strong that a majority of U.S. citizens were convinced at the beginning of the assault on Iraq that Saddam was directly responsible for 9/11. Bush is an expert in using weasel words, just like Weeks. Maybe Bush went to the same disinformation school that Weeks attended. [snip] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
USS LIBERTY CASE EVIDENCE JUSTIFIES REOPENING | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 0 | April 2nd 04 08:31 PM |
USS LIBERTY CASE EVIDENCE JUSTIFIES REOPENING | Ewe n0 who | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 2nd 04 08:31 PM |
THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES | Ewe n0 who | Naval Aviation | 4 | February 21st 04 09:01 PM |
THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 2 | February 12th 04 12:52 AM |
Letter from USS Liberty Survivor | Grantland | Military Aviation | 1 | July 17th 03 03:44 PM |