![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Doug "Woody" and Erin Beal" wrote in message
... The jet was intelligently designed. The diagnostic MSP codes it pumps out (while not 100% accurate) significantly reduce trouble shooting--for instance leading AT's to the correct LRU the first time--as opposed to the (admittedly more "romantic") troubleshooting techniques on older Grumman jets. This is the result of a systems engineering approach to maintenance. (F-35 is even better OBTW.) A ground-up redesign on the Tomcat might be able to incorporate some of these features, but you're still saddled with the constraints of the basic airframe. You hit the nail right on the head. As a former Tomcat avionics tech, I will admit the F-14 challenged me to be a better tech - however the learning curve was very steep. When I transferred to Pax in the late 80's I was shocked to learn how easy the Hornets were to work on (all us avionics types worked out of the same workcenter at the late great SATD). The lessons learned then serve me well now as an R&M engineering tech. One minor nit - "LRU" is usually a USAF term. We tend to call boxes WRA's in the Navy. (Weapons Replaceable Assembly). -CJ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|