![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "petem" wrote in message . .. well look like the lack of wmd in irak proove that the resolution that the UN passed was enforced... No proof of that at all And who was working for the oil-rich countries before becoming the president? If you mean Bush I believe he was working for the Texas Rangers before becoming govenor although you are free to bring up the usual conspiracy theories And who is still friend with them? And can you give me a link to a web syte..(a reputed one...not any blog or supposely news site)that support the story about UN taking Bribes from those country You want evidence UN individuals took bribes from Iraq? You can't be serious France was the FIRST country to help the USA in its strugle to be free... That was over 200 years ago when France actually had some guts They still have guts but they do have wisdom too..wich other are lacking... France is one of the biggest offender in much of this, because of it's stagnant economy they are constantly selling components commonly used in weapons (conventional, nuclear and biological) to whoever will pay the bill, same with Germany and Russia The fact is France, Germany and Russia were against the war for one reason, Iraq was a customer France and Canada where against the war because their governments have no backbone and choose to look a blind eye to the worlds problems A blind eyes...lets talk about behing blind....what do you do about the spreading of nuclear weapon in asia? Good question, if we invade them would you whine and cry about it like you do with Iraq? North Korea has nukes because Clinton and the UN were spineless to actually do something about it, same thing is happening right now with Iran. Rules are worthless without enforcement which is why you will always see nothing but resolutions and sanctions from the UN, they've never had the guts for military action and ALWAYS have to be dragged into enforcement by the United States Gee I think thats the general purpose of death row isn't it? Killing someone as a punishment for crimes is as intelligent as beating a few month old baby cause he cries.. Now thats a brilliant analogy, a baby doesn't know any better while a serial killer tends to understand what he does wrong now tell me does it help lowering the crime rate?? It prevents those individuals from doing it again, I'd say it reduces crime by 100% UN is trying to prevent the USA to take us ALL in a stupid war..Too bad you cant understand that.. No the UN is a gutless corrupt organization that does nothing in the face of danger, too bad you can't understand THAT Proove to me the corruption.. Umm didn't you watch the news last week? I will show you 20 times more corruption in the white house.... Go for it Mark i know that as an American this is sounding like i am against American poeple wich is so far from the true... I don't say that, I'd say you are much like many on the left who believe loony conspiracy theories or have such a hatred for Bush that they blindly believe many of the stories floating out there In fact i am very happy to have a super nation beside my nation...it helped me and my fellows go on with less worry..till Bush came to power.... Personally if I lived in Canada I'd love to have a neighbor actually doing something instead of just talking about it, but thats just me Attaking a country to fight terrorism will not help..its only creating more extremist that will attack the USA Then explain the reasoning for 9/11, if you are correct then that should never have happened right? BTW: Doing nothing also tends to create extremists American troops are not welcome in any part of Irak.. Give me proof of that, I can find countless stories claiming otherwise but you still think that you delivered them from a Bad dictator.. Well I don't think we delivered them from a GOOD dictator What they really see is that they used to have a dictator and a country...now they have a country that dictate them and they lost there country... Yes thats why they were able to vote last week thats not an improment...that dictator would have died anyway..and who knows what would have came after him.. Like North Korea usually the son/sons take his place, now that would have been fun wouldn't it? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1988 "Aces High" (Military Airplanes) Hardcover Edition Book | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 23rd 04 05:18 AM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
Tactical Air Control Party Airmen Help Ground Forces | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 22nd 04 02:20 AM |
enola gay and military aviation -serious | old hoodoo | Military Aviation | 2 | December 28th 03 09:19 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |