![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Brian Sandle" wrote in message
... Eric Hocking wrote: [..] Wow, that's a great deal of discussion you've decided to ignore there. How about you do a nice little table of when and where crop circles appeared in UK with the dates that restrictions were lifted, as that is your claim and it is a bit hard to look up. Then we can try to decide what percentage level of significance can be attached to any correlation in the data set, given the amount of data. I had this discussion back when it when it happened, often with the cropcircleresearcher site hosts and contributors themselves. You think I've not already charted this data and had this discussion over 2 years ago? I'm not going to be dragged, yet again, into a discussion only to have it culminate with the entire post being deleted and ignored. I smacks too much of the blinkered approach by "believers" of ignoring facts that they don't like (remember the weather?). Two examples below, descriptions from the UK database, summing up why I think it's next to pointless discussing this subject "scientifically" with proponents of non-humans being circle builders. 1: The word 'Sexsmith' within a circle - presumably made as a hoax to promote the Canadian rock singer of the same name? 2. A series of letters, forming the word 'COCK' - presumably indicating it's status as a hoax." Now there's scientific, unbiased analysis if ever I saw it. -- Eric Hocking www.twofromoz.freeserve.co.uk "A closed mouth gathers no feet" "Ignorance is a renewable resource" P.J.O'Rourke Attempting spam blocking - remove upper case to reply. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|