![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric Hocking wrote:
Brian Sandle wrote in message ... Eric Hocking wrote: [...] The red line is 2001. http://uk.f2.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/...lbum?.dir=/31c a The is the step in the graph about 25 -31 May 2001. No. 25th May is the first circle listed in the database for 2001 Yes May 25 is the first. Then there are several but groups of several can occur at any time. All the graphs have steps in them from time to time. What you need now to do is understand what the graph is telling you. Look at it again, this is what it tells you. FIRST circles appear: 1999 - 12/4 2000 - 26/4 2002 - 6/5 2001 - 25/5 6 weeks later than 1999, 4 weeks later than 2000 and 3 weeks later than 2002 This is exactly the correlation that I have been talking about and you have been refusing to admit. The first circles in 2001 were LATE. before then 2002 had 1 circle, 2000 3, 1999 5 or 6. The beginning dates for the years is a fairly evenly spread distribution. Some year has to be first and some last. The "average" date for the first circle to appear in those 4 years is 2nd May. 2002 and 2001 are the only years to be later than this, by 4 days and 23 days respectively. Not my idea of an even spread. Going back to 1992, the average date is 25th April - 2001 is *27* days later that this. The only other years later than this average is 1993 (3 days) and 1996 (17 days). With a standard deviation of 13 over the 10 years, only 2 years stand out. 1996 and 2001. An aside, it's pure coincidence that in March 1996 the BSE epidemic came to a head and that mass slaughters took place in the UK So to say that there is a "fairly evenly spread distribution" is to ignore the evidence. Dates of first appearance in Wiltshire according to database, undetermined dates omitted. 80 Aug 15, 82 Aug 1, 88 Jul 15, 89 Jul4, 87 Jul 1, 91 Jun 9, 96 Jun 1, 01 May 25, 93 May 14, 92 May 10, 95 May 8, 02 May 6, 98 May 4, 90 May 2, 00 & 03 Apr 26, 94 Apr 23, 97 Apr 20, 99 Apr 12 So they have only been appearing in April since 2000. Could be hoaxes with the more complex patterns more recently. I have not yet got through to the FMD dates, but if there are more hoaxes now they could be interrupting those. Taking the range of reported ones in Wiltshire back to 77 (unknown date) teh 1981 May 25 has 11 before and 7 after - It is pretty much to the middle. What has been said about fairy rings on people lawns? Can the same thing happen in a crop? Even on people's skin a fungal infection will sread out in a circular fashion. It's not a day or two - see the initial chart. Even srpead from year to year for start. Not chronologically they are not. 2001 is later than all previous TEN years as well as later than 2002. Not for date of first occurence. See the numbers above. Check them yourself - you have a table of the dates, since you quoted them at me before snipping my entire reply. I still have it in mind to go back to that. I've had kooks from sci.skeptic attempt to go "real life" on me too - and been threatened with legal proceedings and had my website suspended due to some rather damning evidence hosted their that showed a well known "psychic" being caught on video, cheating at his most famous parlour trick. Though sometimes they are mimmicking themselves or showing what a conjurer would do, and it gets taken as them faking. "mimmicking[sic] themselves" ? Name one instance of this. One. I have never, ever, heard a self-confessed "psychic" or similar EVER say they were mimicking their act or showing how a conjurer might do it. I have heard one admit to cheating (only when caught) so, "I didn't disappoint my audience". Riiigghhtttt. In the example I gave, the "psychic" kept a continual banter of "I'm doing this with my mind" - even while the video clearly showed him performing the "feat" with his hands. I think this is sort of meant to build the energy so that real things can start to happen? This is the same one who a judge decide that the cost of a ticket (and court costs?) to one of his shows should be reimbursed to a punter who charged that "he had failed to perform the supernormal feats of telepathy, parapsychology, and telekinesis he advertised. Instead... [his] act consisted merely of sleight-of-hand and stage tricks. When USA was broadcasting its space feats on radio into USSR in the Russian language it didn't prove anything to the Russian people because the energy was jammed. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|