![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.aviation.owning Mike Rapoport wrote:
wrote in message ... snip The question remains, at what HP level, based on the physics of the engines, does the crossover from piston to turbine occur? As additional criteria, assume specific fuel consumption is the most important parameter and that the A/C spends the majority of its time in flight not doing touch and goes. I think that you can look at the market to see where the crossover occurs. THere are currently no production piston aircraft engines over 450hp and there are no aircraft turbines under 400hp. There's lots of ground turbines under 400hp so we know there's a market there; i.e. they must be practical and competive with pistons or they wouldn't sell. I thought the Chinese were still making a big radial, but I could be wrong on that one and it is a bit of a nit. If gasoline hadn't risen to twice the price of Jet-A (at least in parts of Europe), no one would be seriously discussing diesel engines for aircraft or actively developing them as several manufacturers are now. So put it this way, if it were the turbine makers instead of the diesel makers that jumped on this bandwagon, what would be their smallest engine? -- Jim Pennino Remove -spam-sux to reply. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|