![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
if the logbook says a 100hr inspection was completed IAW the maint manual..
then only what is in the maint manual for a 100hr inspection counts.. the seals were not logged as replaced, so it did not happen... if the 100hr inspection entry makes reference to a "work order number", then a copy of that work order should be with the maint logs... if you as the owner do not have a copy of the work order, from your receipt of payment for services.. that is your problem.. as far a buyer or insurance rep would say... if it is not in the log books , it did not happen and it would devalue your aircraft. BT "Peter" wrote in message ... "Denny" wrote N registered aircraft are required to have all work recorded in the airframe and powerplant logs, what you apparently call maintenance records... I have no idea why you would think otherwise... My 1957 Apache came with an armload of logbooks going back to day one... In this country a plane that does not have a complete set of logbooks suffers a significant drop in the value of the aircraft... Logbooks yes. I have the logbooks. But logbooks don't contain the *details* of work done. They should contain references to other documents. For example a logbook might say that a 100hr check was done. What it won't say (unless the engineer felt like writing it in there) is that the landing gear gas seals had to be replaced and two instrument panel light had to be replaced, etc; that will be in a separate file which is referenced in the logbook. My question was whether *** under FAA rules *** the aircraft owner is entitled to have a copy of these separate files. I have just been advised by email from someone who I know should know that the maintenance firm *is* required by the FAA to keep copies, so if they do hand the originals over they are allowed to make a reasonable charge for copying. One of the problems with purchasing a second user aircraft is that even if all the logbooks are present, there is no record of what might have been a very long string of minor rectification work, especially if some of the various maintenance firms involved have gone bust. Peter. -- Return address is invalid to help stop junk mail. E-mail replies to but remove the X and the Y. Please do NOT copy usenet posts to email - it is NOT necessary. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Records Show Bush Guard Commitment Unmet | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 53 | September 13th 04 05:49 PM |
Bush's Military Records again the Subject of Cort Action | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 5 | July 21st 04 10:24 PM |
USS Liberty Challenge/Reward | Issac Goldberg | Naval Aviation | 75 | July 16th 04 09:28 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |