![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
We have all seen the film of the Spruce Goose lifting off the water for a
My father was the lead structural engineer for the Goose fues. analysis. He and two others designed all the frames and other parts you see in the big hull. He was employed at Hughes 1939-44, employee number 60 (I think) an Structural Aero Engineer from Carnigie Tech. His opinion was simple. The aircraft would not have been controllable in "normal" flight. The control surfaces were direct driven with some sort of air assist. Hughes insisted on direct connection to the surfaces, and it would have not been possible to fly. With some of the boost systems developed in the later 50's, it would have worked, but just ask those who flew the big bombers in WW2 what it was like. Bruce Patton (more later, got to go now) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Doug Fir vs: Sitka Spruce | Lou Parker | Home Built | 40 | November 10th 03 06:36 PM |
| Off topic, but Hiarous! | Morgans | Home Built | 1 | November 2nd 03 05:24 AM |
| Off topic - Landing of a B-17 | Ghost | Home Built | 2 | October 28th 03 05:35 PM |
| Wood questions - Public Lumber Company, determining species at the lumberyard | Corrie | Home Built | 17 | September 17th 03 07:51 PM |
| Glass Goose | Dr Bach | Home Built | 1 | August 3rd 03 06:51 AM |