![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wright1902Glider" wrote in message ... There seems to be an important part of the story missing in this thread. The aircraft's original designation was HK-1, which stood for Hughes-Kaiser. But when the aircraft finally flew, it was only designated H-1. So what happened to our 'ol buddy Henry Kaiser? He saw the light. Without a war, a monster-airplane is just that. And without payloads, that means a monster hangar-queen. Which is what the H-1 eventually became. Kaiser quit the project before it was finished. Hughes, on the other hand, kept at it. And as systems problems delayed to completion of the plane, questions arose. He didn't have much of a choice when it came to finishing and flying the plane... he was being investigated by a Congressional committee who believed the entire project was nothing more than a boondoggle. Still, it would be intresting to see what the performance numbers would be. My guess is that it would be very slow and very sluggish... not unlike a certain other famous airplane built by two brothers from Ohio. Its longest flight lasted about as long. Harry Henry Kaiser talked Howard Hughes into the project in the first place. In 1942, Kaiser was building Liberty Ships which were being sunk by Hitler's submarines at an alarming rate. Henry wanted to deliver high priority cargo by air and avoid the subs. 175 MPH is slow for a big airplane, but it is very fast compared to a 12 knot Liberty Ship. Had the HK-1 been available in '42 it would have been seen as a war winner. Is it fair to say that the HK-1 was late or that the war was won sooner than many planners thought? Had critical battles in Europe gone Hitler's way, WW2 might have lasted until 1950, and the HK-1's fate might have been very different. Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Doug Fir vs: Sitka Spruce | Lou Parker | Home Built | 40 | November 10th 03 05:36 PM |
Off topic, but Hiarous! | Morgans | Home Built | 1 | November 2nd 03 04:24 AM |
Off topic - Landing of a B-17 | Ghost | Home Built | 2 | October 28th 03 04:35 PM |
Wood questions - Public Lumber Company, determining species at the lumberyard | Corrie | Home Built | 17 | September 17th 03 06:51 PM |
Glass Goose | Dr Bach | Home Built | 1 | August 3rd 03 05:51 AM |