![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Kaplan" wrote in message s.com... MGW Tower routinely seems to not know where I am located when I call in on the approach. They will sometimes, for example, ask me to "Report DIXIN Inbound" when I am already inside DIXIN; if they saw me on radar they would not ask for such a report. You said pilots are not told "Radar Service Terminated" on the ILS 18 to MGW. If Morgantown does not have radar then pilots should be told that radar service is terminated. The MVA is indeed 3000 MSL in the WAY area. How do you know? So as mentioned in an earlier posting IFR traffic could be at 3000 MSL in the MGW area and thus conflicting with the departure procedure from MGW runway 18. Enroute traffic is typically kept higher for that very reason. One reason why I might execute an approach at MGW to get into WAY would be in the winter if I anticipate possible icing in the descent and I want the option to land at MGW if I accumulate ice vs. continue to WAY if I am ice-free. Full flaps are not permitted on my airplane after I have encountered icing conditions, and I would much prefer to execute such a landing straight-in out of an ILS to the 5000 foot runway at MGW rather than to fly a traffic pattern around WAY and land on its 3500 foot, slightly sloping runway. Another reason why I might execute an approach at MGW to get into WAY is to get a sense of whether I am likely to be able to complete a visual approach to WAY. Circling WAY at 3000 feet I might be able to see straight down to the airport yet forward visibility might be reduced when I start a visual approach to WAY; the only way to get below 3000 feet at WAY is to cancel IFR, so I could find myself IMC on a VFR flight plan below radar and radio reception altitudes. I have found that a better plan is to execute the ILS into MGW and then decide if the weather will allow me to proceed IFR to WAY or if I should instead land at MGW. So executing an instrument approach at MGW has nothing to do with proceeding IFR to WAY then? It's just to get a check on the weather? You fly the approach, miss, and then climb to the MVA and proceed to WAY? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
MN Airport Closure Notification Legislation (S.F. 2178/H.F. 2737) | Dan Hoehn | General Aviation | 1 | May 25th 04 01:52 PM |
Here's the Recompiled List of 82 Aircraft Accessible Aviation Museums! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 18 | January 20th 04 04:02 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 3 | October 1st 03 05:39 AM |