![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually what you are referring to is Chrysler and Garmin did not lose the
business.. The system bought by Chrysler from Alpine was at a higher price (~$1600) point than the one being developed by Garmin for Chrysler. The stock was ready to take a hit, having run from $20 to $50 with no real pullbacks. Automotive is indeed going to be the largest market but the margins are going to be the lowest. Mike MU-2 "Mark T. Mueller" wrote in message news ![]() I believe it was GM. It was reported back in June. Garmin's stock took a hit after the announcement, since the auto sector represents the greatest revenue growth potential for GPS equipment makers... Aviation, as we all know, is a very small, niche market compared to the auto sector. "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message link.net... "Mark T. Mueller" wrote in message ... The 430/530 do not meet the WAAS TSO (146a, I believe). They were designed long before this TSO went final. Garmin always said the 430/530 would be "upgradeable", but I think the final TSO caught them by surprise. You WILL need a hardware upgrade in the boxes to provide the 1 Hz refresh rate required by the TSO. Garmin reps at OSH this year stated the upgrade should be available early next year, but based upon Garmin's typical schedule challenges, it will probably be more like late 04 before they can provide good turn-around, and that's assuming they don't find any "issues" with the hardware upgrade... There will be a significant software upgrade as well. Seeing as there are only a handfull of LNAV/VNAV approaches published, I don't see the hurry in finding the que. I will wait a bit until the hardware upgrade is on the street for a couple months and any inevitable problems are worked out... In the meantime, were I to buy right now, I would probably go for the CNX80, but I would be concerned that Garmin has just bought UPSAT and future product support. The "gist" I got from the Garmin reps at OSH was their entire engineering staff is focused on rolling out the high dollar G-1000, and everything else is taking a back seat at the moment. Kind of disappointing, since I was hoping they would come out with an interface for the 530 with WxWorx instead of that pathetic EchoFlight... Garmin lost a major auto contract recently because of their high pricing structure. Don't know how that's going to effect their business model, but I hope they refocus on their core aviation market. I'm waiting. DB What auto maker was that? Mike MU-2 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Garmin GNS-430 vs. CNX80 | Mike Adams | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 17th 04 04:57 AM |
Different WAAS altitude readings | Wyatt Emmerich | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | June 29th 04 07:27 PM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Instrument Flight Rules | 42 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |
Garmin buys UPS AT... | Lenny Sawyer | Instrument Flight Rules | 39 | August 3rd 03 07:34 PM |
Garmin Behind the Curve on WAAS GPS VNAV Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 18th 03 01:43 PM |