![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 8-Oct-2003, Newps wrote: Shoulda bought a 182. Same or more speed for less money. The 182 is a very fine airplane but you've got it reversed. The Arrow is typically a few knots faster, and for planes of comparable age, equipment, and condition the 182 will probably sell for thousands more. The 182 costs more to operate, too. Its engine is more expensive to overhaul, and the higher fuel costs for the 182 will usually more than offset the higher maintenance costs for the Arrow's landing gear. The planes actually have similar mission capabilities, but the more efficient Arrow will generally do it for somewhat lower cost at the expense of somewhat greater complexity. -- -Elliott Drucker |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I'm outta here | Richard Riley | Home Built | 0 | August 4th 03 05:15 PM |