![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is way too much to pay. Once the airplane is made airworthy and is
flying, other deficiencies will become apparant. Mike MU-2 "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Carl Orton wrote: My thoughts are that since a test flight has not occured, that more things might crop up, so the price should be decremented some more. Is there any rule of thumb for these situations? Dunno about a simple rule of thumb, but here's mine. Take the value of a similar aircraft in average condition. Subtract the amount that it would take to repair the known deficiencies. Your first offer should be in this ballpark. Then take the same average value of a similar aircraft and subtract half the amount it would take to repair the known deficiencies. Under no circumstances should you allow the owner to negiotiate the price higher than this. Yoy take your chances on unknowns. George Patterson You can dress a hog in a tuxedo, but he still wants to roll in the mud. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Floridians Are Hit With Price Gouging | X98 | Military Aviation | 0 | August 18th 04 04:07 PM |
Garmin Price Fixing Post from other newsgroup | TripodBill | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | July 16th 04 04:50 PM |
150HP Grumman Super Yankee FS Price Reduced! | Bill Berle | Home Built | 6 | December 2nd 03 12:55 AM |
The Top 10 Reasons to Purchase "New" | Patty | Owning | 4 | August 4th 03 10:44 PM |