![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
: Sydney, have a look at the fcc link I posted a couple messages ago. It lets
: you look up towers' owners by lat/long. Your tower is owned by KTVI chan 2. : Thanks. Cool, I thought that you might have kill-filtered me for some reason, because no one other than me seemed to be getting my messages! ![]() : So it *is* something specific to our plane I guess. : Although it's an intermittant problem for us, too. Aha, I think we're on to something. : : We didn't have this problem before last spring. : : Did channel 2 recently add a digital TV transmitter? Like, last spring? : I believe so, yes. On further reflection, this may be a red herring. Digital TV is in the 220+ MHz region. : So here's what I'm thinking. : That tower is TV Channel 2 (60-65 MHz I think?) : Channel 5 which is nearby would be 79-84 MHz. : This makes me think that marker beacons, at 75 MHz, : are the logical suspect for causing a problem. Channel 2 is 54 to 60 MHz, the 2nd harmonics of are 108 to 120 MHz. This leads me to suspect one of the *NAV* radios. Can you physically remove them from your plane, one at a time, and leave them in your car? This would take their front end circuitry out of the area. Then try the other one. The COM radios would also be out of the picture. Perhaps you've already done this? The reason that I'm harping on radios is that intermodulation distortion needs a detector or a modulator to occur, such as in the RF front end of a radio. I don't think that an antenna by itself is sufficient to cause it. Also, you might try taking out the nav antenna splitter. I'm not sure that this should make any change, but if we're using buckshot methods... Since I changed jobs I don't have my trusty HP 8591E spectrum analyzer anymore, if I did I'd consider a trip to St Louis! : But can the marker beacon antenna, by itself, be somehow : bringing signals into the plane to be received by the : rubber whip antenna of our handheld? If you disconnect the MB antenna from the MB receiver, it is unlikely that the end of the coax could act as much of a radiating element. I have made a passive radiator before, but that's 2 antennas connected to each other. : If this is a possibility, how do we safely remove the : marker beacon antenna for testing purposes? Do we need If you've got the bent metal rod kind, disconnecting the little floating wire will disconnect the MB antenna from the in-plane electronics, though I'm inclined to dismiss the MB system. If you wish to electrically remove the antenna from the plane while leaving it physically in place, you can get a "terminator" cap from most electronics stores that cater to the ham radio crowd. I'm not sure Radio Shack sells them. You'd want a 50-ohm terminator, and whatever adapters are needed to connect it to the end of the antenna coax. If I were doing this, I'd probably terminate the RF input to the radio, as well. Please keep us (me) informed, we're trying to help the best we can! -- Aaron Coolidge (N9376J) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
September issue of Airman available | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 2nd 04 04:39 AM |
Bogus Issue | jls | Home Built | 2 | August 15th 04 04:47 AM |
RF interference issue again (esp. for E Drucker and Jim Weir and other RF wizards) | Snowbird | Home Built | 78 | December 3rd 03 09:10 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 3 | October 1st 03 05:39 AM |
September issue of Afterburner now on line | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 9th 03 09:13 PM |