A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

RF interference issue again (esp. for E Drucker and Jim Weir and other RF wizards)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old November 5th 03, 01:30 PM
Snowbird
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Aaron Coolidge wrote in message ...
Cool, I thought that you might have kill-filtered me for some reason, because
no one other than me seemed to be getting my messages!


No, not at all, though I'm reading news through groups.google.com
which is flaky on propegation

BTW someone said they emailed me. I didn't receive it. This
email address no longer works. If anyone wants to email me
try hoeltzli at swbell dot net. Though this discussion seems
on-topic and of possible general interest so I'd just as soon keep it
on the net.

On further reflection, this may be a red herring. Digital TV is in the
220+ MHz region.


Can this kind of intereference be caused by subtracting frequencies?

Channel 2 is 54 to 60 MHz, the 2nd harmonics of are 108 to 120 MHz.


That's too low for the frequencies where we're getting interference
(124.2 is clean, 126.5 is trash)

This leads me to suspect one of the *NAV* radios. Can you physically
remove them from your plane, one at a time, and leave them in your car?


Not a problem. Can this really be caused by a radio which is *powered
off*? Because I did try switching the navs to different frequencies
and also turning them off, along with all the electrical power in the
plane.

Since I changed jobs I don't have my trusty HP 8591E spectrum analyzer
anymore, if I did I'd consider a trip to St Louis!


Oh, bummer! That would have been nice.

: If this is a possibility, how do we safely remove the
: marker beacon antenna for testing purposes? Do we need


If you've got the bent metal rod kind


Pretty sure it's a blade, though I admit the MB antenna is "out of
sight out of mind" to me.

If you wish to electrically remove the antenna from the plane while leaving
it physically in place


I'm perfectly happy to take it off and slap some 50 mph duct tape over
the resulting hole, providing it's not going to hurt the MB receiver
to be attached to dangling coax.

If I were doing this, I'd probably
terminate the RF input to the radio, as well.


IIRC this would be a PITA -- the coax goes to the antenna with a
standard BNC connector, but is soldered on to the radio tray.

Please keep us (me) informed, we're trying to help the best we can!


I appreciate this. It's a vexing problem and one which apparently
lies outside our radio guy's experience

Thanks,
Sydney
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
September issue of Airman available Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 2nd 04 04:39 AM
Bogus Issue jls Home Built 2 August 15th 04 04:47 AM
RF interference issue again (esp. for E Drucker and Jim Weir and other RF wizards) Snowbird Home Built 78 December 3rd 03 09:10 PM
Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! Bill Mulcahy General Aviation 3 October 1st 03 05:39 AM
September issue of Afterburner now on line Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 9th 03 09:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.