![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aaron Coolidge wrote in message ...
Cool, I thought that you might have kill-filtered me for some reason, because no one other than me seemed to be getting my messages! ![]() No, not at all, though I'm reading news through groups.google.com which is flaky on propegation BTW someone said they emailed me. I didn't receive it. This email address no longer works. If anyone wants to email me try hoeltzli at swbell dot net. Though this discussion seems on-topic and of possible general interest so I'd just as soon keep it on the net. On further reflection, this may be a red herring. Digital TV is in the 220+ MHz region. Can this kind of intereference be caused by subtracting frequencies? Channel 2 is 54 to 60 MHz, the 2nd harmonics of are 108 to 120 MHz. That's too low for the frequencies where we're getting interference (124.2 is clean, 126.5 is trash) This leads me to suspect one of the *NAV* radios. Can you physically remove them from your plane, one at a time, and leave them in your car? Not a problem. Can this really be caused by a radio which is *powered off*? Because I did try switching the navs to different frequencies and also turning them off, along with all the electrical power in the plane. Since I changed jobs I don't have my trusty HP 8591E spectrum analyzer anymore, if I did I'd consider a trip to St Louis! Oh, bummer! That would have been nice. : If this is a possibility, how do we safely remove the : marker beacon antenna for testing purposes? Do we need If you've got the bent metal rod kind Pretty sure it's a blade, though I admit the MB antenna is "out of sight out of mind" to me. If you wish to electrically remove the antenna from the plane while leaving it physically in place I'm perfectly happy to take it off and slap some 50 mph duct tape over the resulting hole, providing it's not going to hurt the MB receiver to be attached to dangling coax. If I were doing this, I'd probably terminate the RF input to the radio, as well. IIRC this would be a PITA -- the coax goes to the antenna with a standard BNC connector, but is soldered on to the radio tray. Please keep us (me) informed, we're trying to help the best we can! I appreciate this. It's a vexing problem and one which apparently lies outside our radio guy's experience Thanks, Sydney |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
September issue of Airman available | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 2nd 04 04:39 AM |
Bogus Issue | jls | Home Built | 2 | August 15th 04 04:47 AM |
RF interference issue again (esp. for E Drucker and Jim Weir and other RF wizards) | Snowbird | Home Built | 78 | December 3rd 03 09:10 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 3 | October 1st 03 05:39 AM |
September issue of Afterburner now on line | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 9th 03 09:13 PM |