![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Don Gourlay" writes:
We used Blackstone for a couple of years. They alerted us to the fact that the aluminum content had shot up. Ended up doing a top overhaul. Previously the leak down tests were ok. We had heard this can change quicky which it did. The analyiss was the trigger. AME said things would be been fine for about another 100 hours but we did the top anyway. A lot of people on the field laughed at doing the analysis every oil change. Don-- I have an Aircoupe with a C-90 engine. First airplane owned so I'm still learning. OK, my mechanic is skeptical of lab analyses, and prefers examining the oil and filter after each change. Best would be to do both, but my question to you and others is-- If you could only do one thing: either lab analysis of oil after each change, or your own visual examination of oil and filter after each change, which would you do? In your above scenario where the lab alerted you to a problem, would you have noticed the problem by doing a visual inspection of oil and filter--like seeing metal particles? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Engine Oil Analysis help, please | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 7 | October 26th 03 05:27 AM |
AOA - Aviation Oil Analysis Results Missing? | George Sconyers | Owning | 5 | September 27th 03 11:29 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
expense analysis | Rosspilot | Owning | 12 | August 25th 03 03:34 AM |