![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 10:08:45 -0600, "Dan Luke"
wrote: "Tom S." wrote: They're not; they have atrocious safety records due to their spin characteristics. Baloney. There has been one fatal accident attributed to a spin, and in that one the pilots failed to deplot the recovery chute. They might have if the chute worked. As a result of a number of failures of the chute the entire deployment mechanism was replaced (after the fatal accident just mentioned). The insurance companies seem to think that the Cirrus accident rate is high and they are charging a lot for insurance. They are also reluctant to insure pilots for an SR22 with less that 500 hours and an instrument rating. Just what about their safety record do you find so encouraging? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|