|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#4
November 14th 03, 01:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
I consider it more of a fun to fly airplane, the plastic one, whereas
the Bo's, although a delight, are more of a mission type. More useful load, etc. Personal opinion of a Bonanza man. Not too sure about the roomier claim. Sounds like the sicilian claims Mooney people have when they say the backwards tailed wonders have only 4" less cabin room than a Bonanza. Pure bull****! On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 10:11:38 -0600, "Dan Luke" wrote: "Stu Gotts" wrote: For long CC's, a Bonanza is tops. For short hops (500 miles) I'd sure like a Cirrus. Why? The Cirrus is roomier than the Bo and has better designed seats. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode