![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom S. ) wrote:
The roport said (IIRC) that they actuator lever was erratic and stiff (OWTTE). Perhaps you were stating that but one interpretation of your post could be that the deployment system failed, which was not able to be proven. The report said they tried to deploy and it didn't; then the investigator tried and it still wouldn't. Tom, regarding the fatal spin accident only, your recollection of the report is incorrect. The accident aircraft was so damaged by collision and fire that the CAPS system was not able to be tested by the investigation team in the manner your recall. http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1D723A86 The report did note that the parachute itself was found still in a packed state, the safety pin of the deployment handle could not be located, and the deployment rocket propellent had been expended. There was no damage to the inside of the composite cap that covered the parachute system. Additionally, the report indicates that the aircraft was in compliance with service bulletin that addressed the difficulty of deployment issue that the SR22 had in early 2002, a fact I hadn't known until rereading the report (this aircraft was based at my home airport). Again, my only point was to mention that the accident investigators could not determine why the chute did not deploy. I interpreted your original post to imply that they did. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|