|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
November 15th 03, 01:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
I wasn't ready/willing to risk my $75,000 Tiger on Idaho back country strips
either! For that, give me a Cessna 182...  "Snowbird" wrote in message om... Stu Gotts wrote in message . .. Just about everyone. Especially the owners. On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 14:07:39 -0600, "Dan Luke" wrote: "markjen" wrote: Finally, a Bonanza is a much more rugged/substantial airplane, Says who? Well, I haven't heard much one way or the other about Cirrus and Lancair as short or rough field airplanes. Has anyone? I know Bonanzas have a (surprising, to me) good rep as short/rough planes by people who really know how to fly them and are willing to risk "runway rash" by taking them out of rough fields. It wouldn't surprise me if many people who just bought a $300K Cirrus or Lancair for its speed and avionics, aren't willing to risk it on a rough grass strip in backcountry Idaho. Cheers, Sydney 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode