![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom S." wrote in message ...
And that has absolutely nothing to do with fixed-gear vs retractable. Quite frankly, anyone with significant time in a retractable is used to the differences and more attuned to the subtleties/situation than fixed gear types. In fact, a correlation between retract vs. fixed gear and loss of control in simulated IMC has been shown to exist. There are two recent ASF/FAA studies on vacuum failures which speak to the contrary., one in a simulator one in actual airplanes specially modified to allow the observer to randomly fail the vacuum system. The pilots varied in experience, some had quite extensive time in make and model. Here is a link: http://www.cami.jccbi.gov/aam-400A/A...0TEXT/0219.pdf There was a striking difference in how many of the retract pilots lost control vs. how many of the fixed gear pilots. In the study which took place in an airplane, all of the Piper Archer pilots maintained control. 1/4 of the Bonanza pilots lost control. There was no correlation between loss of control and overall experience or time in type. In fact, IIRC in one of the studies time in type was a *negative* corellator, possibly because pilots with high time in type may feel more confident and go longer between recurrent training. Just to inject some facts. Cheers, Sydney |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|