![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "James M. Knox" wrote in message ... Kevin wrote in news ![]() NTSB Identification: NYC01FA040 . The docket is stored in the (offline) The pilots family is suing the FAA for wrongful death. This report clearly indicates the pilot was at fault. Inexperienced in IMC and flew it into the ground. What am I missing here? Probably the fact that the NTSB conclusions can not be admitted to court for the lawsuit. So it's just a matter of what an attorney can convince the jury of that *might* have happened. Not true. Provided the judge allows such a case to go to the jury, the jury must be convinced by the greater weight of the evidence that the defendant owed a specific duty of care to the plaintiff, that the duty was breached, and that the breach proximately caused the plaintiff's damages. Doesn't have to prove that his scenario DID happen, just that it might have. This is a misstatement of the law. It is misleading. "Might" have could mean a 1 in 3 chance, which is insufficient to get the case to the jury. ----------------------------------------------- James M. Knox TriSoft ph 512-385-0316 1109-A Shady Lane fax 512-366-4331 Austin, Tx 78721 ----------------------------------------------- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|