|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#18
November 29th 03, 11:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"James M. Knox" wrote in message ...
.... So it's just a matter of what an attorney can convince the jury of that *might* have happened. Doesn't have to prove that his scenario DID happen, just that it might have. Actually, proving that it "might have happened" won't do. He has to prove "by a preponderance of the evidence that it is more likely than not" that it did happen. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode