![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan Thompson" wrote
OK, you win. Cirrus owners are stupid. Don't speak for the group - the Cirrus owners I've met are actually quite bright. Of course none of them would suggest that the chute was a reasonable backup for icing TKS can't handle. In fact, the only Cirrus owner I ever met who considered the chute an important selling point had a very interesting reason. He used to own a Bonanza, and his wfe wouldn't fly with him. Now he has a Cirrus, and his wife will - she considers it safe because of the parachute. That's worth a lot to him, since now the plane can be used for family trips. As dumb as car drivers and bikers. I have yet to see any evidence that pilots are on average any smarter than drivers. They are generally somewhat better trained. They would be idiots to try the chute as a last resort in an iced-up airplane. I was stupid to mention it. What was I thinking? I have no idea what you were thinking. Have you ever made a parachute descent through icing conditions? Have you ever made a parachute descent at all? This, IMO, is the fundamental problem with the Cirrus chute. Most of the pilots flying it have zero experience with parachutes, and thus a very poor understanding of what they're good for. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|