![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks James, that is a well done letter.
"James M. Knox" wrote in message ... I spoke to an active member of Angel Flight who said they were concerned that they may get caught up in this ruling because it was so badly written. Do you know anything about that? Here's the piece I just wrote for our Angel Flight South Central members: Angel Flight SC Volunteers: Some of you have become aware of a new Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) from the FAA entitled "National Air Tour Safety Standards NPRM." This proposal has changes that impact not only pilots and organizations that operate sightseeing flights, it also has major changes to what are called "charitable fundraising" flights. Reasonably, many have inquired as to how this might impact Angel Flight. The short answer is, not directly at all. The flights discussed within the body of the NRPM refer not to Angel Flight type operations, but rather to flights where the proceeds of the flight go to charity. Examples of these would be events where a non-profit raffles off a flight, or where a siteseeing flight is donated a charity for auction. While Angel Flight welcomes the donations of any money contributed by any pilot wishing to personally perform such a flight, Angel Flight itself does not currently utilize such a method to raise funds. Clearly, our regular flight "missions" in support of medical and humanitarian needs do not fall within the realm of this NPRM and we are not directly affected. Regardless, many pilots and pilot groups have come out opposed to the NPRM in its present form, feeling that it unreasonably burdens small siteseeing operations and charitable fundraising with substantial costs and paperwork for little if any real improvement in safety. AOPA has written several articles on the matter. An example can be viewed at http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsite.../03-4-069.html The FAA has invited comments through 20-January-2004 on this NPRM. While Angel Flight does not, as an organization, involve itself in any political process, you as a pilot may wish to view this NPRM and make comments, pro or con. You can view the entire NRPM and comment on it via links from the above AOPA web site article, or by means of the Federal Document Management System: http://dms.dot.gov/search/searchFormSimple.cfm From there, just enter the number 4521. You will be able to view the entire proposal, see comments made by other pilots and organizations, and enter your own comments if you wish. Again, this proposal in its present form does not impact Angel Flight America or Angel Flight South Central. It does, unfortunately, show an increasing tendency to regulate (some would say "over regulate") charitable organizations involved with flying. James M. Knox Chairman - AFSC ----------------------------------------------- James M. Knox TriSoft ph 512-385-0316 1109-A Shady Lane fax 512-366-4331 Austin, Tx 78721 ----------------------------------------------- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights | Geoffrey Sinclair | Military Aviation | 3 | September 4th 09 06:31 PM |
Proposed new flightseeing rule | C J Campbell | Home Built | 56 | November 10th 03 05:40 PM |
Does the 3-1 rule apply to air combat? | BUFDRVR | Military Aviation | 15 | October 30th 03 12:22 AM |
Hei polish moron also britain is going to breach eu deficit 3% rule | AIA | Military Aviation | 0 | October 24th 03 11:06 PM |
Ownership and passengers | Roger Long | Owning | 30 | October 11th 03 02:00 PM |