![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't afford a turbine, but I like reading about them.
A Waco isn't a bad choice for the 100th anniversary. Lots of Twins are owned by partnerships of experienced spam can pilots, especially pilots that enjoy working in the hangar on weekends (the twin has twice as much to fix, oh boy!). One local partnership has a car mechanic that easily works on the plan 5 times as much as he flies it. If you want to win a 172, buy something from Sporty's. People who can't afford the taxes on the Waco are not much better off with a 172 costing 3/4ths the amount. Since it will be sold by these types of winners, the more valuable the better. I really like that they give away renovated planes, because most members fly older planes. Most of us dream about spending a planes value in mods, but aren't rich enough to through that kind of money around. A completely renovated Twin will not likely be valued nearly as much as it is worth to the winner (twin prices are depressed due to the cost of operations). I hope the winner sells half to a partner, and uses the money to pay the taxes, and get the training to fly it! AOPA is doing a great job in trying times, I am surprised they have time to put out such a great mag. "James Blakely" wrote in message ... Is it just me, or is it that AOPA is starting to ignore the Spam-can pilot? I've been a member for about 5 years now and each year, the airplane they give away becomes more impractical. They claim the Waco is worth $200k but it is a day VFR only aircraft. How useful is that? Now, next year, they are giving away a twin. What percentage of pilots have a ME ticket? How many could get insurance? It is not just the airplanes either. I used to think that the AOPApilot magazine was one of the best. Now, almost half of it is dedicated to turbine operations. I do not see a turbine in my future at all. It really seems to me like AOPA is moving away from the weekend pilot and moving toward the semi-professional pilot. It seems to me that they are just supporting part 91 operations just because that is where most professional pilots get their start. So, what do you think? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
BOHICA! Weiner's Bill to Restrict GA | Orval Fairbairn | Home Built | 95 | September 20th 04 02:07 AM |
BOHICA! Weiner's Bill to Restrict GA | Orval Fairbairn | General Aviation | 74 | September 18th 04 02:19 AM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 139 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |