![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony Cox wrote:
That's how I got into this conversation in the first place, and why I think my existing W&B is out! I thought that your point was that the AP who did the last W&B weighed it with the fluids in place, but then subtracted the "consumable fluids", but forgot to account for the "unusable" fluids? The differences in weighing proceedures shown for various models on the 182 TCDS either call for computing a "dry" weight, or a "wet" weight where the aircraft is ready to fly, but contains only the "unusable fluids". I cannot conceive a situation where the capacity of your fuel tanks could change by ~ 10 gallons unless some major mods were done to the fuel system, i. e. plastic liners inplace of bladders, etc. The "unusable" fuel in my 182 is only 3 gal (79 usable, 82 total), so even if the AP did the calc wrong, we would be quibling about only ~ 18lbs. How you think you got screwed out of 60lb? MikeM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How long to keep VOR check records? | Ross Oliver | Instrument Flight Rules | 27 | April 10th 04 06:57 PM |
F-22 Lies | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 59 | January 18th 04 05:43 AM |
D'Amato's Role Investigated in La Guardia Airport Deal | Roy Smith | General Aviation | 0 | December 25th 03 05:47 AM |
Flyong from Toronto (Ontario) to Pitsburg Intl | Anthony Acri | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | July 26th 03 05:28 PM |