|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#6
May 15th 04, 04:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... You don't want a 205. Only got 260 hp and has the 182 wing. It's a tri-gear version of the 185. They only used the 185 for one year in developing the 205. Then they used the 210 to make the 205. The 205 is more properly a derivative of a 210, it is on the 210 type certificate and was built using the same jigs. Has the 185 wing and engine. Like I said, 260 hp. Wingspan is 8" greater than the 182. It's the same wing. Weighs more than a 182. True. Gets outperformed by a 182. It's faster, It's the same speed or slower. Although we're only talking a few knots. climbs better, Climbs worse when at gross. Has to, weighs too damn much. Has worse takeoff performance, has to, too damn heavy for the power. Same wing as a 182 and only 30 more hp to lift 500-700 more pounds. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode