![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Having said that, the FAR police are not about to come out and see that you've
fabricated a bracket or panel out of aluminum to replace a cracked plastic panel. Me? I'd stay away from titanium and make it all out of aluminum just to keep the odd inspector out of the picture. They understand aluminum. They don't have a freakin' CLUE about titanium. Do NOT, under ANY circumstances allow yourself to be drawn into the 337-FSDO-Engineering paperwork nightmare. Do it, be safe, and be happy. Jim Bill Zaleski shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: -The FAR's do NOT specify "equivelant or better". Owner produced parts -must conform to the original specifications and production processes. -You are not allowed to make an aircraft part "better" unless you -obtain an STC or field approval. Owner produced parts do not require -a 337, as they are not major repairs or alterations. Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Which aircraft certification is required for R&D? | Netgeek | Home Built | 5 | November 23rd 04 06:59 AM |
| VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 06:03 AM |
| Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 02:26 AM |
| Partnership Question | Harry Gordon | Owning | 4 | August 17th 03 12:23 AM |
| STC question | John Galban | Owning | 1 | August 9th 03 02:00 AM |