![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jon Kraus wrote:
They have a 1975 Mooney M20 N6832V, I think model "C" at my home airport. The owners have had it for years and have traded up to a twin Comanche (sp?). It has a new engine (250 hours) and a new 3 blade McCaulley prop. The avionics are decent (Bendix KMA 24 audio, 2 - KX155 nav/com KT76a transponder, KR87 ADF and Garmin 150xl GPS). It has 7150 hours on the tach which seems quite high to me but I am really quite the novice when it comes to airplanes. The interior and paint are decent (6 for the interior, 8 for the paint). They are asking $45,000 for it. I have done some research and this seems like an OK price but I haven't seen too many of these with this many hours. Please give me some feeback without flaming me too bad. :-) Like all airplanes, Mooney's design is a compromise. In the Mooney, they have biased the compromise in favor of going fast and economically, at the expense of ease of entry and exit, and (some say) comfort and space. Personally I think you have to admire the engineering tailored for a particular mission, high-speed, economical cross-country personal travelling. If you "get it" you can overlook the comfort and space issues. It's more like sitting in a sports car with your fanny close to the belly pan and your legs straight out in front of you. I find it a comfortable seating position, others may not. By contrast, brands C and P (particularly C) are more like a kitchen chair seating position. The windscreen is close to your face, which gives a wide angle of view, but makes some feel claustrophbic. The landing gear is so simple and reliable that you can almost ignore the extra expense. You do have to swing the gear at annual, but compared to brands C and P, the landing gear is trouble-free. It's an all mechanical system with no hydraulics. It just works. The "suspension" is hard with no hydraulic struts to absorb the bumps. You will not be taxiing as fast as brands C or P. It's also unforgiving of misjudged landings. You -will- bounce. If you're buying used, find out when the "hockey pucks" hard rubber suspension was last replaced. Mooney recommends every 10 years. It's about a $2K repair. If you take the weight off the wheels and the pucks don't expand to fill the extra space, it's time to replace them. As someone else mentioned, fuel leaks are another potential problem and expensive repair. The ground clearance of the main landing gear fairings is a consideration if you plan on operating from rough fields. Get a good instructor with lots of Mooney experience to check you out. Type knowledge will save you lots of time in learning to land it. It's not hard, but it's definitely different. I'm biased because I have a J model, but you might consider whether you want to hold out for a J. It has a lot of aerodynamic cleanup and goes a little faster and farther then the earlier models on the same amount of fuel. Prices are, of course, correspondingly higher. I love mine, wouldn't go back to Cessna for anything, but it's not for everybody. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mooney drops into my backyard | Dave Butler | Owning | 41 | May 11th 04 10:19 PM |
Advice request -- buying an airplane | Casey Wilson | Owning | 4 | April 19th 04 03:22 PM |
Mooney info | eddie | Owning | 13 | March 12th 04 06:42 PM |
Mooney to Offer Light Sport Airplane | Rick Pellicciotti | Home Built | 4 | September 24th 03 01:08 PM |
Cirrus vs Mooney | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 6 | July 8th 03 11:35 PM |