![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message
... I'll take issue with you on items 3 and 4. With the principle (comparative to similar types) or the numbers? 3) Its landing distance is greater than many compatible tourers: because the airframe is clean, it floats. So for short fields it tends to be the landing distance that is limiting. I wouldn't want to operate a M20J regularly out of much less than 2700 ft as you don't have much safety margin at less than that. If you have that and don't visit short strips very often, no problem. Usually, the only reason it floats is because folk come in at well over 1.3Vso. Yeah but that's the same with every aircraft type. I would have no hesitation about being based at a 2,000' strip (at sea level). Maybe something got lost in translation. All our runways are measured in metres. I agree 2700 ft (about 820 m) is quite conservative. 2000 ft feels short. The book gross performance is 1550 ft, which is about 2200 ft with the recommended safety factor. Going into KBGR regularly, I rarely have a problem turning off at the first taxiway (1100') and I'm usually off the ground from my home base in about 1000', without using short-field technique. Touching down at the end, that seems about right. If you're landing it in 1100 ft from 50 ft then I'd like to see it... ;-) 4) Its crosswind performance is ugly, particularly for take-offs. The undercarriage uses rubber disks for its springs, and the wing is very low to the ground. Hence any bumps and you lose any side force from the wheels, and you have a lot of lift relatively early in the take-off roll. If you operate an M20J from a single runway airport in a windy part of the world, this may be an issue. If you only rarely have to deal with 20 knot crosswinds, no problem. Again, I think this is a technique issue, both on takeoff and landing. Never had a serious issue on landing. But there are physical limits for take-off for any aircraft. I never like the idea of spending much time on one wheel for a take-off, so I start to get nervous when I can't keep both tyres on the runway below rotation speed. I don't know what else you fly, Ron, but aircraft like the TB20, the PA28s and most light twins seem to handle crosswind take-offs with rather more comfort. Julian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any opinions on the Garmin GNS 480 ! ! ! | RonLee | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | January 18th 05 12:33 PM |
Opinions on Cessna 340, 414 and 421 | john szpara | Owning | 55 | April 2nd 04 09:08 PM |
Opinions wanted | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 65 | January 21st 04 04:15 AM |
OPINIONS: THE SOLUTION | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 4 | January 7th 04 10:43 PM |
Rallye/Koliber AD's and opinions | R. Wubben | Owning | 2 | October 16th 03 05:39 AM |