![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Carter wrote:
wrote in message ... Jim Carter wrote: ... If the friend is a US pilot, there are the restrictions of 14 CFR 61.113 about reimbursement. The restrictions prohibit the pilot (friend) from making a profit, they do not restrict the owner from recovering a pro-rata percentage of the operating cost of the aircraft. I believe the total costs would be considered operating costs because if the owner didn't invest in the aircraft to start with how could it be operated at all? And you would be wrong. From 14 CFR 61.113 (c) ....provided the expenses involve only fuel, oil, airport expeditures, or rental fees. As a US private pilot, you can't "share" the cost of such things as engine overhauls, home based tie down fees, insurance, normal maintenance, etc. If you want to concider it a rental, then all the requirements like 100hr inspections apply. Right. That's part of my point when I mentioned renting costing more than just direct costs, however I suppose a 100 hour would be an additional direct cost with which the private owner wouldn't have to deal. As a US operation, you can't charge for anything other than a prorated share of the expenses noted above and be operating under 14 CFR 61. In any case, if I were to share an auto trip with someone, I wouldn't expect them to pay a share of my annual insurance or prorated cost of new tires. -- Jim Pennino Why not Jim? How is it fair that the owner pay for items from which the passenger benefits? I have to admit that I don't charge passengers to ride with me in the car as long as I have to go anyway, but that's my choice. The fair thing is to split all costs evenly and that should be assumed by any passenger in any vehicle. If the owner/operator wants to be more gratious then that's their choice, not the passengers. Mr. Norris was the passenger on this trip, and it was he who had written that he wouldn't pay anything except direct costs. I think that is the morally wrong position for him to take. The bottom line is under US regs you can't legally do this under 14 CFR 61. -- Jim Pennino Remove -spam-sux to reply. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 2 | February 2nd 04 11:41 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |