![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 14:10:11 GMT, "Mike Rapoport"
wrote: "Nathan Young" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 04:39:45 GMT, "Mike Rapoport" wrote: "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote in message ... The Lancair IVP is a possible solution as pointed out be several people.but it really has no weather capability. No radar, known ice, no lightning hardening. It is fast, fairly simple and cheap to operate. It also has no room inside. Disagree with the room comment. A L-IV has a bigger cabin than most GA 4 place singles. However, this is much smaller than any twin cabin, and certainly the turboprop cabins. My hanger neighbor is building a beautiful (OSH Grand Champion level) turbine IVP. All I can say is that the cabin looks smaller than a 182 to me! Cabin size comparisons: L-IV: 46 inches in front, 43 in rear, 48 tall C172: 39.5", 39.5", 48" C182: 42", 42", 48.5" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Want simple flight planning software | marc | Home Built | 13 | December 20th 04 04:36 AM |
Pre-flight planning really is worth doing. | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | August 25th 04 10:17 PM |
Route planning question | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | April 4th 04 02:40 PM |
Re; What do you think? | Kelsibutt | Naval Aviation | 0 | September 29th 03 06:55 AM |