![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had the tech run it on the bench with his digital cable driver from 1000
up to about 3500 RPM and the tach readout matched at each stage. I also checked with my optical tach through the windscreen at 2500 and got a match. Before the overhaul 2500 on the analog tach gave me 2580 on the optical tach. I started to investigate the tach when I couldn't understand why the static RPM on an obviously strong engine didn't meet the minimum book value. I also learned from this exersize that the error was not proportional i.e. an 80 RPM error did not translate to a 40 RPM error at half the speed. -- Regards, Mike http://mywebpage.netscape.com/amountainaero/fspic1.html "Jon Woellhaf" wrote in message news:riRcd.414274$Fg5.254744@attbi_s53... Mike Noel wrote that he had his analog tach overhauled and that it is, "... now giving accurate readings across the RPM range." Mike, How do you know it's accurate? Just curious. Jon |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instrument Checkride passed (Long) | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | February 11th 05 02:41 AM |
Instrument overhaul - Are all overhauls created equal? | RonLee | Home Built | 1 | February 7th 05 06:35 PM |
Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) | Alan Pendley | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | December 16th 04 02:16 PM |
Logging approaches | Ron Garrison | Instrument Flight Rules | 109 | March 2nd 04 05:54 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |